Cited by 50Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMusic Therapy and Health

The effect of auditory enrichment, rearing method and social environment on the behavior of zoo-housed psittacines (Aves: Psittaciformes); implications for welfare

Open access
Williams, Isabelle, Hoppitt, Will, Grant, Rachel·2017·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.10.013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hand-reared parrots were found to be more likely to suffer from abnormal repetitive behaviours and were more averse to interacting with humans and enrichment compared to naturally-reared birds.

    “hand-reared parrots were found to be more likely to suffer from abnormal repetitive behaviours and were more averse to interacting with humans and enrichment compared to naturally-reared birds [136].”

    From The visitor effect on zoo animals: implications and opportunities for zoo animal welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [136]

    The Results (section 2.1.2) and Discussion (section 4.1.4) report more stereotypic behaviour and less interaction with enrichment in hand-reared than parent-reared birds. They do not report greater aversion to interacting with humans; the Introduction (section 1.1) instead says hand-reared birds often prefer human contact over contact with other parrots. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Altman, J.D. 1998. Animal activity and visitor learning at the zoo. Anthrozoos: A multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 11(1), pp: 12-21
  2. Benaroya-Milshtein, N., Hollander, N., Apterm A., Kukulansky, T., Raz, N., Wilf, A., and Pick, C.G. 2004. Environmental enrichment in mice decreases anxiety, attenuates stress responses and enhances natural killer cell activity. European Journal of Neuroscience, 20(5), pp: 1341-1347.
  3. Boone, A., and Quelch, V. 2003. Effects of harp music therapy on canine patients in the veterinary hospital setting. The Harp Therapy Journal. 8(2), pp: 4-5.
  4. Brent, L., and Waver, O. 1996. The physiological and behavioral effects of radio music on singly housed baboons. Journal of medical primatology. 25 (5), pp: 370-374.
  5. Brent, L., and Stone, A.M. 1996. Long-term use of televisions, balls, and mirrors as enrichment for paired and singly caged chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 39(2), pp: 139-145.
  6. Engebretson, M. 2006. The welfare and suitability of parrots as companion animals: a review. Animal Welfare 12: pp263-276.
  7. Elgar, M.A. 1989. Predator vigilance in group size mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biological Reviews, 64 (1), pp: 13-33.
  8. Garner, J.P., Meehan, C.L., Famula, T.R. and Mench, J.A., 2006. Genetic, environmental, and neighbor effects on the severity of stereotypies and feather picking in Orange-winged Amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica): An epidemiological study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 96(1), pp.153-168.
  9. Gold, C., Solli, H.P., Kruger, V., and Lie, S.A. 2009. Dose-response relationship in music therapy for people with serious mental disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review, 29(3), pp: 193-207.
  10. Harris, L.D., Briand, E.J., Orth, R., and Galbicka, A. 1999. Assessing the value of television as environmental enrichment for individually housed rhesus monkeys: a behavioral economic approach. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 38(2), pp: 48-53.
  11. Kalmar, I.D., Janssens, G.P., and Moons, C.P. 2010. Guidelines and ethical considerations for housing and management of psittacine birds used in research. ILAR journal. 51(4), pp: 409-423.
  12. Kogan, L.R., Schoenfeld-Tracher, R., and Simon, A.A. 2012. Behavioural effects of audtiroy stimulation on kenneled dogs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 75 (5), pp: 268-275.
  13. Konishi, M. 1970. Comparative neurophysiological studies of hearing and vocalizations in songbirds. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural and Behavioural Physiology, 63 (3), pp: 257-272.
  14. Mallapur, A., Quereshi, Q., and Chellam, R. 2002. Enclosure design and space utilization by Indian leopards (Panthera pardus) in four zoos in southern India. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 5(2), pp: 111-124.
  15. Mason, G.J. 1991. Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour, 41(6),pp 1015-1037.
  16. Meehan, C. and Mench, J., 2006. Captive parrot welfare. Manual of parrot behavior, pp.301-18.
  17. Pepperberg, I.M. 2006. Cognitive and communicative abilities of Grey parrots. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100(1-2), pp. 77-86.
  18. Rubinstein, J., & Lightfoot, T. 2012. Feather loss and feather destructive behavior in pet birds. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, 21(3), pp. 219-234.
  19. Seibert, L.M., 2006. Social behavior of psittacine birds. Manual of parrot behavior, pp.43-48).
  20. Spangenberg, E.R., Grohmann, B., and Sprott, D.E. 2005. It's beginning to smell (and sound) a lot like Christmas: the interactive effects of ambient scent and music in a retail setting. Journal of Business Research. 58 (11) pp: 1583-1589.
  21. Speer, B. 2014. Normal and Abnormal Parrot Behaviour. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, 23,pp 230- 233.
  22. Steele, K.M. 2003. Do rats show a Mozart effect? Music Perception, An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(2).
  23. Tromborg, C.T., Mitchell, G., Markowitz, H., and Morgan, K. 1993. Sound and its significance for captive primates. American Journal of Primatology. 30, pp: 352-353.
  24. Van Hoek, C.S., and Cate, C.T. 1998. Abnormal Behaviour in Caged Birds Kept as Pets. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1(1),pp 51-64
  25. Videan, E.N., Fritz, J., Howell, S., and Murphy, J. 2007. Effects of two types and two genre of music on social behaviour in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. 46(1), pp: 66-70
  26. Wells, D.L. 2009. Sensory stimulation as environmental enrichment for captive animals: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 118 (1), pp: 1-11.
  27. Westerhof,L., and Lumejij, J.T. 1987. Feather picking in the African grey parrot. Proceedings of the European Symposium on Bird Diseases, Beerse, Belgium. Netherlands Association of Avaian Veterinarians. Pp. 98-103.
  28. Yalch, R.F., and Spangenberg, E.R. 2000. The effects of music in a retail setting on real and perceived shopping times. Journal of business Research. 49 (2), pp: 139-147

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, I., Hoppitt, W., & Grant, R.
Affiliations
  • Oaklands College (GB)
  • Hartpury University (GB)
Corresponding author
Grant, Rachel
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
186
Pages
85-92
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2547826261
Cited by
50
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
  • Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Anglia Ruskin University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
auditory enrichment, parrots, zoo animal welfare, hand-rearing, social environment, stereotypy, vocalizations, preening, music genres, group housing, captive birds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review