Cited by 2,875Stress Responses and CortisolAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology

Open access
Koolhaas, J.M, Korte, S.M, De Boer, S.F, Van Der Vegt, B.J, Van Reenen, C.G, Hopster, H, De Jong, I.C, Ruis, M.A.W +1 more·1999·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

This paper summarizes the current views on coping styles as a useful concept in understanding individual adaptive capacity and vulnerability to stress-related disease. Studies in feral populations indicate the existence of a proactive and a reactive coping style. These coping styles seem to play a role in the population ecology of the species. Despite domestication, genetic selection and inbreeding, the same coping styles can, to some extent, also be observed in laboratory and farm animals. Coping styles are characterized by consistent behavioral and neuroendocrine characteristics, some of which seem to be causally linked to each other. Evidence is accumulating that the two coping styles might explain a differential vulnerability to stress mediated disease due to the differential adaptive value of the two coping styles and the accompanying neuroendocrine differentiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00026-3

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bolhuis JE, Schouten EGW, Wiegant VM, de Jong IC. Individual differences in pigs: behavioral response to apomorphine. Proc. 32nd Int. Soc. for Appl. Ethology, 821998 (abstract).
  2. Holst, 1986, Vegetative and somatic components of tree shrew's behaviour, J Auton Nerv Syst suppl, 657
  3. Korte, 1992, Conditioned neuroendocrine and cardiovascular stress responsiveness accompanying behavioral passivity and activity in aged and in young rats, Physiol Behav, 51, 815, 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90120-Q · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F., Van Der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., De Jong, I. C., Ruis, M. A. W., & Blokhuis, H. J.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Koolhaas, J.M
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-11
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
925-935
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116707460
Cited by
2,875
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 117 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 145 · 2021: 149 · 2020: 197 · 2019: 157 · 2018: 162 · 2017: 158 · 2016: 169 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 152 · 2013: 143 · 2012: 127
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
coping styles, proactive coping, reactive coping, stress physiology, neuroendocrine system, stress-related disorders, feral populations, domestication, livestock, population ecology, behavioral consistency
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review