Cited by 30Refrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesHeat Transfer and Optimization

Development and validation of a microchannel evaporator model for a CO 2 air-conditioning system

Jin, Jifeng, Chen, Jiangping, Chen, Zhijiu·2011·Applied Thermal Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.06.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jin, J., Chen, J., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Jiangping
Venue
Applied Thermal Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
31
Issue
2-3
Pages
137-146
ISSN
1359-4311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012354622
Cited by
30
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Thermal Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation (021111127)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
Keywords
microchannel evaporator, CO2 refrigerant, mobile air conditioning, pressure drop correlations, two-phase flow, cooling capacity, evaporator design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review