Phase-change materials (PCM) for automotive applications: a review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conducting computational analyses through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and finite element methods (FEMs) are the most favourable methods of conducting simulation for PCM based thermal storage systems.
“It is discovered that conducting computational analyses through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and finite element methods (FEMs) are the most favourable methods of conducting simulation for PCM based thermal storage systems [94].”
From Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review (2020) · cites this paper as [94]
Cites
A General Energy Balance for Battery Systems
Bernardi, D., Pawlikowski, E., & Newman, J. (1985) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2113792 · Cited by 2,548 · see citing works
A review on lithium-ion battery ageing mechanisms and estimations for automotive applications
Barré, A., Deguilhem, B., Grolleau, S., Gérard, M., Suard, F., & Riu, D. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040 · Cited by 1,758 · see citing works
Jaguemont, J., Boulon, L., & Dubé, Y. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.034 · Cited by 1,188 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Latent thermal energy storage technologies and applications: A review
Jouhara, H., Żabnieńska-Góra, A., Khordehgah, N., Ahmad, D., & Lipinski, T. (2020) · International Journal of Thermofluids · doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2020.100039 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Potential of macroencapsulated PCM for thermal energy storage in buildings : a comprehensive review
Rathore, P. K. S., & Shukla, S. K. (2019) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.221 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Hassan, F., Jamil, F., Hussain, A., Ali, H. M., Janjua, M. M., Khushnood, S., Farhan, M., Altaf, K., Said, Z., & Li, C. (2022) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101646 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Barreneche, C., Martín, M., Calvo-de la Rosa, J., Majó, M., & Fernández, A. I. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24071232 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jaguemont, J., Omar, N., Van den Bossche, P., & Mierlo, J.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Jaguemont, Joris
- Venue
- Applied Thermal Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 308-320
- ISSN
- 1359-4311 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2780445906
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 20.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Thermal Engineering (publishedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
- Keywords
- phase change materials, battery thermal management system, automotive batteries, PCM classification, heat transfer, energy storage density, battery cooling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
