Falsification and the protective belt surrounding entity-postulating theories
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tight links are needed between theoretical constructs and the auxiliaries and conditions of measurement, so that empirical problems can be attributed to the theory rather than to the measure.
“There needs to be tight links between theoretical constructs and the auxiliaries and conditions of measurement, so that empirical problems can be attributed to the theory rather than to characteristics of the measure (Hayes, 2004).”
From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Contextual Behavioral Science: Examining the Progress of a Distinctive Model of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy (2013) · cites this paper as Hayes, 2004
The strategy of requiring falsifiable hypotheses is not emphasized within functional contextualism, the philosophy underlying the PF model.
“What is interesting about this strategy is that it reflects the current, dominant, realist “paradigm” and is not the primary strategy emphasized in the Skinnerian operant approach, nor is it emphasized within the approach of functional contextualism, the philosophy underlying the PF model.2,5”
From Reply to Johan W. S. Vlaeyen and to Melissa A. Day and Beverly E. Thorn (2014) · cites this paper as [2]
The strategy of requiring falsifiable hypotheses is not the primary strategy emphasized in the Skinnerian operant approach.
“What is interesting about this strategy is that it reflects the current, dominant, realist “paradigm” and is not the primary strategy emphasized in the Skinnerian operant approach, nor is it emphasized within the approach of functional contextualism, the philosophy underlying the PF model.2,5”
From Reply to Johan W. S. Vlaeyen and to Melissa A. Day and Beverly E. Thorn (2014) · cites this paper as [2]
The strategy of requiring falsifiable hypotheses reflects the current dominant realist paradigm.
“What is interesting about this strategy is that it reflects the current, dominant, realist “paradigm” and is not the primary strategy emphasized in the Skinnerian operant approach, nor is it emphasized within the approach of functional contextualism, the philosophy underlying the PF model.2,5”
From Reply to Johan W. S. Vlaeyen and to Melissa A. Day and Beverly E. Thorn (2014) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
Analytic Goals and the Varieties of Scientific Contextualism
Hayes, S. C. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315745138-14 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., Plumb-Vilardaga, J., Villatte, J. L., & Pistorello, J. (2013) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2009.08.002 · Cited by 1,120 · see citing works
Self-citationHayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2012.09.004 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Self-citationTreatment development: can we find a better way?
Hayes, S. C., Long, D. M., Levin, M. E., & Follette, W. C. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.009 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationReply to Johan W. S. Vlaeyen and to Melissa A. Day and Beverly E. Thorn
McCracken, L. M., & Morley, S. (2014) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.01.002 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hayes, S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hayes, Steven C
- ORCID
- Hayes, Steven C
- Venue
- Applied and Preventive Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-37
- ISSN
- 0962-1849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047102464
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2020: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied and Preventive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Keywords
- falsification, verificationism, protective belt, auxiliary hypotheses, theory testing, philosophy of psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
