Short-term mesofauna responses to soil additions of corn stover biochar and the role of microbial biomass
Open accessAbstract
Biochar additions have been suggested to influence soil microbial communities that, through a cascade effect, may also impact soil fauna. In turn, any direct biochar effects on fauna can influence microbial communities through grazing, physical fragmentation of organic debris (and biochar) and modifying soil structure. If biochar creates a favorable environment for soil microorganisms, it is also plausible for fauna to be attracted to such microbially enriched habitats. However, how soil fauna respond to biochar addition to soil and what are the main factors that drive their behavior has rarely been experimentally addressed. Therefore, the behavior of two mesofauna species was assessed as a result of corn stover biochar (slow pyrolysis at 600°C) additions to a loamy temperate soil, after preincubation for 2, 17, 31 and 61d, and related to variations in microbial biomass and activity. Microbial biomass increased by 5–56% and activity by 6–156% with increasing biochar rates for the different preincubation times. Over the incubation time, microbial biomass did not change or increased at most 15% with the different biochar rates, while in turn microbial activity decreased steadily (around 70–80% at day 61). Enchytraeids generally did not show avoidance or preference to biochar when provided with an alternative unamended soil, while collembolans often showed avoidance responses. However, collembolan avoidance to biochar decreased or disappeared in biochar mixtures with higher microbial biomass and water extractable NH4-N content, agreeing with the plausible role of microorganisms to potentially attract soil fauna after biochar applications. Avoidance response was mainly explained by environmental preferences of the test species and not by any toxic effect of the biochar in this study. However, avoidance after the application of biochar may still need to be considered due to the potential negative impacts of individuals’ migration on soil ecosystem functioning.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074 · see citing works
Self-citationDomene, X., Mattana, S., Hanley, K., Enders, A., & Lehmann, J. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.035 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationMcCormack, S. A., Ostle, N., Bardgett, R. D., Hopkins, D. W., & Vanbergen, A. J. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12046 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review
Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Li, Z., Tan, X., Huang, X., Zeng, G., Zhou, L., & Zheng, B. (2016) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-016-0372-z · Cited by 1,144 · see citing works
Kołtowski, M., Charmas, B., Skubiszewska-Zięba, J., & Oleszczuk, P. (2017) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.10.033 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Janus, A., Pelfrêne, A., Heymans, S., Deboffe, C., Douay, F., & Waterlot, C. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.056 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Domene, X., Hanley, K., Enders, A., & Lehmann, J.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Domene, Xavier
- Venue
- Applied Soil Ecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 10-17
- ISSN
- 0929-1393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021907191
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ddd.uab.cat
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Applied Soil Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA, NY-125487, IOS-0965336)
- New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
- National Science Foundation’s Basic Research for Enabling Agricultural Development
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- biochar, corn stover, soil mesofauna, Enchytraeidae, collembolans, microbial biomass, microbial activity, avoidance behavior, preincubation, slow pyrolysis, soil amendment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review