Plasma charging effect on the nanoparticles releasing from the cavitation bubble to the solution during nanosecond Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquid
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The charging effect of the plasma is involved also in subsequent steps of the LAL process.
“Recently it has been shown, that the charging effect of the plasma is involved also in the subsequent steps of LAL process [62,63].”
From Nanoparticles Engineering by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids: Concepts and Applications (2020) · cites this paper as [62]
The two main streams of NPs ejection due to electrostatic repulsion within the particle cloud in the bubble occur immediately after the beginning of the expansion phase and, to a greater extent, between the collapsing stage and the bubble rebound.
“Recently, this phenomenon has been investigated in detail in [62] and it has been found that the two main streams of NPs ejection due to the electrostatic repulsion within the particle cloud in the bubble occurs immediately after the beginning of the expansion phase and, in a greater extent, between the collapsing stage and the bubble rebound [62].”
From Nanoparticles Engineering by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids: Concepts and Applications (2020) · cites this paper as [62]
Cites
Mechanisms and processes of pulsed laser ablation in liquids during nanoparticle production
DellʼAglio, M., Gaudiuso, R., De Pascale, O., & De Giacomo, A. (2015) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.082 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Self-citationNucleation and growth of nanoparticles in a plasma by laser ablation in liquid
Taccogna, F. (2015) · Journal of Plasma Physics · doi:10.1017/s0022377815000793 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nanoparticles Engineering by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids: Concepts and Applications
Fazio, E., Gökce, B., De Giacomo, A., Meneghetti, M., Compagnini, G., Tommasini, M., Waag, F., Lucotti, A., Zanchi, C. G., Ossi, P. M., et al. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10112317 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
“The numb r of ejected AgNPs has been calculated as reported in [62].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Dell'Aglio, M., & De Giacomo, A.
- Venue
- Applied Surface Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 515
- Pages
- 146031
- ISSN
- 0169-4332 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011755172
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Surface Science (publishedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
- Keywords
- laser-produced plasma, nanoparticle charging, nanoparticle release, cavitation bubbles, bubble dynamics, electrostatic pressure, nanoparticle agglomeration, silver nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review