The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of Bacillus species in maintenance of water quality in aquaculture: A review
Open accessAbstract
Aquaculture effluent is often associated with increased organic carbon, suspended solids, phosphates, nitrogenous species (nitrates, nitrites, and ammonia), chemical oxygen demand and biological oxygen demand. This is regarded as a global threat to aquatic ecosystems due to its influence on surrounding waters as well as groundwater. The threat of aquaculture effluent is not confined to the aquatic ecosystems as high levels of phosphorus and nitrogen may become poisonous to plants and change their protein synthesis, enzyme activities, photosynthesis, oxidative stress response, membrane permeability, and respiratory processes. Other forms of water pollution such as the presence of heavy metals as well as pathogenic microbes are issues of concern since they can be transferred through the food chain. Bacillus species have demonstrated great ability in the maintenance of water quality in aquaculture which is simple and cost-effective. This review highlights that Bacillus modulates a wide range of water quality parameters including physical (transparency and total dissolved solids) and chemical (pH, conductivity, chemical oxygen demand, dissolved oxygen, biological oxygen demand, alkalinity, phosphates, nitrogenous species, hardness) water quality parameters, heavy metals, oil spillage as well as maintenance of microbial balance; hence reduction in pathogenic microbes. The efficiency of Bacillus in modulating water quality is greatly dependent on factors such as mode of application, dissolved oxygen, pH, temperature, source of nutrients, strain type, and metal ions. This review further highlights aquaculture activities that lead to pollution and the possible mechanisms used by Bacillus for improving water quality. It is recommended that a range of optimum conditions be established to increase the efficiency of Bacillus in modulating water quality. A better understanding of Bacillus to the genetic level and the development of new genetic tools is also recommended since the ability of microorganisms to modulate water quality is related to their genetic make-up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Camargo, J. A., & Alonso, Á. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.05.002 · Cited by 2,248
Cited by
Rohani, M. F., Islam, S. M., Hossain, M. K., Ferdous, Z., Siddik, M. A., Nuruzzaman, M., Padeniya, U., Brown, C., & Shahjahan, M. (2022) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.037 · Cited by 319
Bacillus subtilis impact on plant growth, soil health and environment: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
Mahapatra, S., Yadav, R., & Ramakrishna, W. (2022) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.15480 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Hlordzi, V., Kuebutornye, F. K. A., Afriyie, G., Abarike, E. D., Lu, Y., Chi, S., & Anokyewaa, M. A.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 100503
- ISSN
- 2352-5134 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093280914
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of Bacillus species in maintenance of water quality in aquaculture: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100503
- The paper
- Hlordzi, V., Kuebutornye, F. K. A., Afriyie, G., Abarike, E. D., Lu, Y., Chi, S., & Anokyewaa, M. A. (2020). The use of Bacillus species in maintenance of water quality in aquaculture: A review. Aquaculture Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.