The DOI matches its Crossref record; 186 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics improved the functionality of aquafeed: Upgrading growth, reproduction, immunity and disease resistance in fish
Open accessAbstract
Aquaculture plays an increasingly significant role in improving the sustainability of global fish production. This sector has been intensified with the advent of new husbandry practices and the development of new technology. However, the increasing intensification and indiscriminate commercialized farming has enhanced the vulnerability of cultivated aquatic species to damage from pathogens. In efforts to confront these various diseases, frequent use of drugs, antibiotics, chemotherapeutics, and agents for sterilization have unintentionally added to the risk of transmission of pathogens and harmful chemical compounds to consumers. Some natural dietary supplements are believed to have the potential to offset this setback in aquaculture. Application of bio-friendly feed additives such as probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics are becoming popular dietary supplements with the potential to not only improve growth performance, but in some cases can also enhance immune competence and the overall well-being of fish and crustaceans. The present review discusses and summarizes the effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics application on growth, stress mitigation, microbial composition of intestine, immune system and health condition of aquatic animals in association with existing constraints and future perspectives in aquaculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Choi, S.-H., & Yoon, T. J. (2008) · Immune Network · doi:10.4110/in.2008.8.3.67 · Cited by 31
RetractedThe State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022
(2022) · FAO eBooks · doi:10.4060/cc0461en · Cited by 5,689
AFRC, R. F. (1989) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x · Cited by 4,149
Fiber and prebiotics: Mechanisms and health benefits
Slavin, J. (2013) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu5041417 · Cited by 2,340
Cabello, F. C. (2006) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x · Cited by 2,329
Probiotic Bacteria as Biological Control Agents in Aquaculture
Verschuere, L., Rombaut, G., Sorgeloos, P., & Verstraete, W. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.655-671.2000 · Cited by 2,283
Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system
Maynard, C. L., Elson, C. O., Hatton, R. D., & Weaver, C. T. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11551 · Cited by 1,598
The role of probiotics in aquaculture
BALCAZAR, J., BLAS, I., RUIZZARZUELA, I., CUNNINGHAM, D., VENDRELL, D., & MUZQUIZ, J. (2006) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.009 · Cited by 1,341
Probiotics and immunity: A fish perspective
Nayak, S. K. (2010) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2010.02.017 · Cited by 1,253
Biofloc technology in aquaculture: Beneficial effects and future challenges
Crab, R., Defoirdt, T., Bossier, P., & Verstraete, W. (2012) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.046 · Cited by 903
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohani, M. F., Islam, S. M., Hossain, M. K., Ferdous, Z., Siddik, M. A., Nuruzzaman, M., Padeniya, U., Brown, C., & Shahjahan, M.
- Venue
- Fish & Shellfish Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 120
- Pages
- 569-589
- ISSN
- 1050-4648 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200258548
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 186
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics improved the functionality of aquafeed: Upgrading growth, reproduction, immunity and disease resistance in fish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.037
- The paper
- Rohani, M. F., Islam, S. M., Hossain, M. K., Ferdous, Z., Siddik, M. A., Nuruzzaman, M., Padeniya, U., Brown, C., & Shahjahan, M. (2022). Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics improved the functionality of aquafeed: Upgrading growth, reproduction, immunity and disease resistance in fish. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
