Cited by 42Aquaculture disease management and microbiotaPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Physiological stress responses in spotted wolffish (Anarhichas minor) subjected to acute disturbance and progressive hypoxia

Lays, Natacha, Iversen, Maren Marie Thode, Frantzen, Marianne, Jørgensen, Even Hjalmar·2009·Aquaculture

Abstract

The spotted wolffish (Anarhichas minor) is considered a promising species for coldwater aquaculture. It is a sedentary, bottom-dwelling fish which exhibits a calm and “non-stressed” behaviour in captivity. There are, however, no reports on the physiological responses to stressors in this species. In the present study we investigated primary (cortisol secretion) and secondary (glucose mobilization) responses to common aquaculture stressors like disturbance and hypoxia. Pre-stress plasma cortisol levels were within those generally considered representative for unstressed fish (~10ng ml⁻¹), whereas basal glucose levels were unusually low (0.3-0.4mM). After exposure to a short, but severe disturbance challenge (emptying the tank of water for 10min), the increase in plasma cortisol level was slow and relatively weak, reaching a peak level of 25ng ml⁻¹ 4 to 8h after disturbance. When the fish were exposed to a gradually decreasing oxygen level in the tank, a significantly elevated plasma cortisol level (35ng ml⁻¹) was seen in the fish that remained in the tank until oxygen saturation had decreased to 20% oxygen saturation after 2.5h. However, a two-fold higher plasma cortisol level (~70ng ml⁻¹) was seen in all fish exposed to reduced oxygen levels (60, 40 and 20% oxygen saturation) after 3.5h recovery in normoxic water. Plasma glucose levels showed only moderate increases (~70%) following disturbance and hypoxia challenges. An in vivo injection of ACTH caused a strong elevation of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.06.039

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lays, N., Iversen, M. M. T., Frantzen, M., & Jørgensen, E. H.
Affiliations
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Jørgensen, Even Hjalmar
Venue
Aquaculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
295
Issue
1-2
Pages
126-133
ISSN
0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064630138
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
spotted wolffish, Anarhichas minor, physiological stress response, plasma cortisol, hypoxia, glucose mobilization, ACTH, coping styles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review