Polychaete-assisted sand filters
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the productivity and functionality of sand filters stocked with marine worms for wastewater treatment at mariculture facilities. Medium bedding sand which is commonly available in coastal sedimentary deposits and nereidid polychaetes (Perinereis nuntia and P. helleri) from Moreton Bay in southeast Queensland were combined and studied in down-flow sand filtration beds. This combination appears to provide a new option for brackish wastewater treatment whereby the activities of the worms help to prevent sand filters from blocking with organic debris and their biomass offers a valuable by-product. Phytoplankton-rich pond waters percolating through sand-worm beds were reliably treated in several useful ways: suspended solids and chlorophyll a levels were consistently reduced by >50% by the process, and nutrients were converted into bio-available dissolved forms. Dissolved oxygen, redox and pH levels were also lowered significantly by the process. Water treatment rates of approx 1500Lm⁻² d⁻¹ were routinely achieved. P. nuntia appeared more suitable than P. helleri for stocking directly into sand filtration beds as nectochaetes, but generally exhibited slower growth. Survival and growth were influenced by stocking density. Sand-filter beds stocked with juvenile worms and fed only with eutrophic pond water demonstrated polychaete production capacities in the order of 300-400gm⁻² (eg. P. helleri: 328gm⁻² in 16weeks). These results show how nereidid polychaetes can be reliably produced within simple, low-maintenance sand filters, and provide data necessary for the functional integration of this novel wastewater treatment system into contemporary seafood farming systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poly-aquaculture was demonstrated in a pilot study in Australia where phytoplankton was grown in nutrient-rich wastewater and fed to invertebrates of various trophic levels, such as sponges, annelid worms and bivalves, which were in turn used as animal feeds for shrimp.
“Poly-aquaculture was demonstrated in a pilot study in Australia where phytoplankton was grown in nutrient-rich wastewater and fed to invertebrates of various trophic levels, such as sponges, annelid worms and bivalves, which were in turn used as animal feeds for shrimp (Palmer, 2010).”
From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Palmer, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Palmer, P. J.
- Corresponding author
- Palmer, Paul J.
- Venue
- Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 306
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 369-377
- ISSN
- 0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040779368
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
- Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Keywords
- sand filtration, Perinereis nuntia, wastewater treatment, mariculture, brackish water, suspended solids removal, nutrient conversion, dissolved oxygen, redox reactions, pH, stocking density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review