The effect of dietary pigments on the coloration of Japanese ornamental carp (koi, Cyprinus carpio L.)
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of dietary supplementation with four pigment sources on the coloration of Japanese ornamental carp (Showa koi) (Cyprinus carpio L.). Showa koi (which are colored black with scattered red patches and white spots) initially weighing 18.04±0.92g were fed five dietary treatments in triplicate: a control diet with no added pigments, a diet with 1.5gkg⁻¹ Carophyll® red (synthetic, CR diet), a diet with 200gkg⁻¹ wet weight of a photosynthetic bacterium (Rhodopseudanonas palustris, PB diet), a diet with 200gkg⁻¹ wet weight of effective microorganisms (EM diet) and a diet with 75gkg⁻¹ dry weight feed-grade Spirulina platensis (SP diet). After a 99day feeding trial, the fish's color was evaluated with a colorimeter to measure the chroma, lightness, redness and yellowness of different color zones. The carotenoid and xanthophyll concentration in the skin and the scales of the fish's red, black and white zones were tested. S. platensis significantly increased the growth and feeding efficiency of koi (P<0.05). S. platensis and Carophyll® red significantly improved the chroma of the black zone, the redness and the chroma of the red zone, and the lightness of the white zone (P<0.05). S. platensis and Carophyll® red increased the carotenoid content of the black and red scales and the xanthophyll content of the black and red skin and scales (P<0.05). The results indicate that Showa koi pigmentation can be modified by supplementing the diet with 1.5gkg⁻¹ Carophyll® red or 75.0gkg⁻¹S. platensis. Dietary R. palustris, at levels up to 1.0gdrymatterkg⁻¹ of diet, does not appear to affect the coloration of Showa koi. Furthermore, body coloration was generally correlated with the dose of dietary carotenoids and xanthophylls, and carotenoids had a deeper and greater influence than xanthophylls.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pigmentation of Showa koi was modified by supplementing the diet with 7.5% Spirulina platensis.
“In another study, the pigmentation of Showa koi was found to be modified by supplementing the diet with 7.5% Spirulina platensis (Sun et al., 2012).”
From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Sun et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Sun, X., Chang, Y., Ye, Y., Ma, Z., Liang, Y., Li, T., Jiang, N., Xing, W., & Luo, L.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Technology (CN)
- Soochow University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Luo, Lin
- Venue
- Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 342-343
- Pages
- 62-68
- ISSN
- 0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087823288
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- koi carp, Cyprinus carpio, fish coloration, dietary pigments, carotenoids, xanthophylls, Spirulina platensis, Rhodopseudomonas palustris, effective microorganisms, photosynthetic bacteria, synthetic carotenoids, fish growth, feed efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review