A techno-economic analysis of industrial production of marine microalgae as a source of EPA and DHA-rich raw material for aquafeed: Research challenges and possibilities
Abstract
The aquaculture industry needs a stable supply of feed resource materials in sufficient quantities and quality for future growth, in particular the fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (dha) and docosahexanoic acid (DHA) which so far have been ensured by inclusion of fish oil. About 70% of the available fish oil is being used in aquafeeds, but the global supply of fish oil is limited and emerging omega-3 markets are competing with the aquaculture industry for this valuable resource. New sources of dha and DHA must be fully developed to cover the global demand, and marine microalgae are regarded as a promising alternative as the primary producer of all the EPA and DHA in marine food webs. Industrial cultivation of phototrophic microalgae is conducted in open pond systems or closed photobioreactor systems, designed to maximize the utilization of light energy and to achieve efficient uptake of nutrients and CO2. The economics of microalgae production heavily depend on the photosynthetic productivity, and there are ongoing efforts to increase the microalgae productivity following different strategies. The first is to exploit the cultivation conditions to direct the metabolism towards lipid production. The second is to improve biomass productivity or lipid yield by mutagenesis and selective breeding, and the third strategy is to improve strains by genetic modifications to optimize light absorption and increase the biosynthesis of EPA and DHA.The inclusion of whole microalgae cells in aquafeeds will require sufficient processing to ensure maximum nutritional uptake, involving dewatering and cell disruption in order to maximize the bioavailability of nutrients. The roadmap of microalgae to become a sustainable aquafeed resource must include interdisciplinary research and development efforts along the whole value chain to achieve biomass production in an industrial scale. A techno-economic analysis of microalgae production was conducted based on biological and technical parameters from the literature under various scenarios, showing that biological productivity, geographical locations and production technology are important factors to lower production cost. The production cost of EPA and DHA equivalents revealed the lowest cost for flat panel photobioreactors in locations with clear sky conditions. Sensitivity analysis showed that optimizing photosynthetic efficiency and doubling of the EPA and DHA yield could reduce the cost to 11.9 USD per kg of total EPA and DHA equivalents. Our findings suggest that focused research efforts can contribute to achieve economically sustainable production of microalgae rich in EPA and DHA for use in aquafeed in the near future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The genetically engineered strain of Phaeodactylum tricornutum produces a maximum yield of 36.5 and 23.6% of DHA and EPA per total fatty acids of biomass, indicating its feasibility for production of EPA and DHA at commercial scale.
“It has been reported that the genetically engineered strain of P. tricornutum produce a maximum yield of 36.5 and 23.6% of DHA and EPA per total fatty acids of biomass indicating its feasibility for production of EPA and DHA at commercial scale [199].”
From The promising future of microalgae: Current status, challenges, and optimization of a sustainable and renewable industry for biofuels, feed, and other products (2018) · cites this paper as [199]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 97 · Cited by 323
- Authors
- Chauton, M. S., Reitan, K. I., Norsker, N. H., Tveterås, R., & Kleivdal, H. T.
- Affiliations
- SINTEF (NO)
- University of Stavanger (NO)
- Uni Research (Norway) (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Kleivdal, Hans T.
- Venue
- Aquaculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 436
- Pages
- 95-103
- ISSN
- 0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002268035
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- The Norwegian Seafood Research Fund — FHF (900771)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Fisheries and Aquaculture Studies
- Keywords
- marine microalgae, EPA, docosahexaenoic acid, aquaculture feed, omega-3 fatty acids, microalgae cultivation, photobioreactors, open pond systems, production costs, techno-economic analysis, photosynthetic productivity, lipid production, genetic modification, cell disruption, microalgae processing, value chain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review