Cited by 109Aquaculture Nutrition and GrowthAquaculture disease management and microbiotaAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Effects of protease supplementation in low fish meal pelleted and extruded diets on growth, nutrient retention and digestibility of gibel carp, Carassius auratus gibelio

Shi, Ze, Li, Xiao-Qin, Chowdhury, M.A. Kabir, Chen, Jia-Nan, Leng, Xiang-Jun·2016·Aquaculture

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of exogenous protease supplementation in low fish meal pelleted and extruded diets on growth, nutrient retention and digestibility, and serum biochemical indices of gibel carp, Carassius auratus gibelio. A high-fish meal (HF) diet containing 90g/kg fish meal and a low-fish meal (LF) diet containing 30g/kg fish meal (60g/kg fish meal was isonitrogenously replaced by soybean meal) were designed as the positive and negative control diet, and 125, 150 and 175mg/kg exogenous protease were supplemented in the LF diet, respectively. The five formulas were then processed with pelleting and extruding, respectively, to obtain ten diets. After the pelleting and extruding, the retention rate of the protease activity was 77.98% and 37.65%, respectively. The diets were fed to gibel carp with an initial body weight of 35.0±0.2g for 12weeks. In pelleted diets, the supplementation of 150 and 175mg/kg protease in LF diet significantly improved weight gain, nutrient apparent digestibility coefficients (dry matter and crude protein), nutrient retention (crude protein and crude lipid) and decreased feed conversion ratio (FCR) when compared to negative control (P<0.05), and showed the similar values as the positive control (HF group). In extruded diets, despite no significant differences in growth, nutrient digestibility and retention among treatments, fish fed diet supplemented with 150mg/kg protease showed numerically higher values than fish fed the negative control diet (P<0.10). When comparing the extruded diets and the pelleted diets, fish fed extruded diets had significantly higher body lipid level and lipid retention than fish fed pelleted diets, and the fish fed extruded diets except the HF diet showed the significantly higher protein retention than fish fed pelleted diets with the same formulation, respectively. There were no significant differences in serum triglycerides, total cholesterol and glucose levels among all groups, and no significant differences in serum total protein and albumin levels among groups except the extruded HF group. The above results showed that the supplementation of 150–175mg/kg protease in pelleted LF diet, but not in extruded LF diet, could improve the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and nutrient retention of gibel carp when compared to the LF diet without protease.The present study showed that supplementing exogenous protease to pelleted diet containing 30g/kg fish meal, but not to the extruded diet, could improve the growth, apparent digestibilities of dry matter and crude protein, and retention of protein and lipid for gibel carp. The above results will guide the proper application of protease in fish diet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.03.049

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In gibel carp, extruded feeds displayed higher protein and dry matter digestibility than pelleted feeds.

    “In another study involving gibel carp, the extruded feeds displayed higher protein and dry matter digestibility than the pelleted feeds (Shi et al., 2016).”

    From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Shi et al., 2016

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 109

Authors
Shi, Z., Li, X.-Q., Chowdhury, M. A. K., Chen, J.-N., & Leng, X.-J.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Ocean University (CN)
  • Jefo Nutrition (Canada) (CA)
Venue
Aquaculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
460
Pages
37-44
ISSN
0044-8486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2340902080
Cited by
109
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquaculture (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Innovation Research Group Developing Project
  • JEFO Nutrition Inc., Que., Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
Carassius gibelio, Carassius auratus gibelio, low fishmeal diet, soybean meal replacement, pelleted feed, extruded diets, fish growth, nutrient digestibility, nutrient retention, feed conversion ratio, serum biochemistry, fish feed formulation, protein retention, feed cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review