Cited by 50Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 214 of the 221 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microalgae cultivation in offshore floating photobioreactor: State-of-the-art, opportunities and challenges

Abstract

The wide application of microalgae in health foods, nutritional feeds, aquaculture, pharmaceutical extracts, and biofuel production, has brought about the advancement of the microalgae cultivation industry. However, commercial-scale cultivation of microalgae still faces one major challenge, which is its economic feasibility, with lower cost and energy consumption. Developing floating photobioreactors to be utilized in offshore open water areas has gained more interest recently as it can diminish the cost effects of onshore land utilization, while seeking for additional benefits, such as regulated temperature, proximity to sunlight and nutrient supplies, and integrated ocean renewable energy. Thereby, this is timely to explore the potential of floating photobioreactors for microalgae cultivation in the offshore region. This review deliberately presents the characteristics of offshore environments and their potential effects on microalgae cultivation, as factors such as location selection, heat capacity, and utilization of cultivation resources are significantly different from conventional land-based cultivation. Compared to land-based photobioreactors, the design of floating photobioreactors has the opportunity to adopt hydrodynamical design; by utilizing the external force from ocean waves to generate internal liquid sloshing for improving the mixing of cultivation medium. While offshore-based microalgae cultivation is considerably new as part of blue economy and mariculture, this review provides insights into the opportunities for further advancement of offshore microalgae cultivation technologies. The encouraging factors for hybridization of offshore microalgae cultivation include mariculture, carbon dioxide capture and utilization, hydrogen production, and ocean thermal energy. Such understandings are vital to improving microalgae cultivation in offshore floating photobioreactors towards a valuable alternative to the current concerns in developing commercial scale of the microalgae industry. Various challenges in biological issues, economic and environmental challenges, installation and maintenance, as well as destructive hydrodynamic loads are also discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2022.102269

Cites

214 of 214 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Items 201–214 of 214

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 221 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Carvalho, 2006, Microalgae reactors: a review of enclosed systems and performances, Biotechnol. Prog., 3, 1490, 10.1002/bp060065r · DOI
  2. Darzins, 2010, Current status and potential for algal biofuels production, IEA Bioenergy Task., 39
  3. Greene, 2016, Marine Microalgae Climate, Energy Food Secur. Sea, 29, 10
  4. Laing, 1998, Guide to wave, Anal., WMO-No, 702
  5. Ono, E., Cuello, J., 2003. Selection of optimal microalgae species for CO2 sequestration. Natl. Conf. Carbon Sequestration. 1–7.
  6. Richmond, 2013, Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Applied Phycology and Biotechnology, Handbook of Microalgal, Culture
  7. Said, 2017, Suppression of Sloshing in Liquefied Natural Gas during Ocean - Going Transportation by using Spherical Floaters and Blanket, J. Transp. Syst. Eng., 4, 1
  8. Sirakov, 2015, The importance of microalgae for aquaculture industry, Rev. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud., 2, 81
  9. Vadlamani, 2019, High Productivity Cultivation of Microalgae without Concentrated CO 2 Input. ACS Sustain, Chem. Eng., 7, 1933
  10. Velea, 2014, New photobioreactor design for enhancing the photosynthetic productivity of Chlorella Homosphaera culture, Rev. Chim., 65, 56
  11. Zittelli, 2013, Photobioreactors for mass production of mircroalgae, Algae Biofuels Energy, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 50

Metadata

Authors
Khor, W. H., Kang, H.-S., Lim, J.-W., Iwamoto, K., Tang, C. H.-H., Goh, P. S., Quen, L. K., Shaharuddin, N. M. R. B., & Lai, N. Y. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
  • Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY)
  • University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
Corresponding author
Kang, Hooi-Siang
Venue
Aquacultural Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
98
Pages
102269
ISSN
0144-8609 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281892693
Cited by
46
References
221
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquacultural Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (FRGS/1/2020/TK0/UTM/02/49)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, blue economy, mariculture, hydrodynamic design, hydrogen production, ocean thermal energy, biofuels, economic feasibility, hydrodynamic forces, site selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review