Cited by 71Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologySelenium in Biological SystemsAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Selenate bioaccumulation and toxicity in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: Influence of ambient sulphate ion concentration

Fournier, Elodie, Adam-Guillermin, Christelle, Potin-Gautier, Martine, Pannier, Florence·2010·Aquatic Toxicology

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate selenate toxicity in the unicellular green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a function of sulphate ion concentration and the relationship with intracellular bioaccumulation. The toxicity of selenate was evaluated by measuring the effect of different selenate concentrations on algal growth during a 96h exposure period. A non-linear regression according to the Hill model was used to describe the dose-effect relationship and estimate the effect concentrations (EC) of selenate. EC(50) values of 0.40[0.24-0.52]micromolL(-1) and of 3.10[1.65-4.86]micromolL(-1) of ambient selenate were obtained, at 8 and 80micromolL(-1) of sulphate ions in the medium, respectively. For non-toxic and low-level ambient selenate concentrations, bioaccumulation in presence of 80micromolL(-1) was one tenth that of 8micromolL(-1) of sulphate ions. When expressed as intracellular selenium burden, EC(50) values determined at 8 and 80micromolL(-1) of sulphate ions were not significantly different (126 and 67nmolSe.10(9)cells(-1), respectively). In conclusion, toxicity appeared to be correlated to selenate bioaccumulation which suggests that toxicity must be linked to intracellular selenium accumulation that is directly dependent on ambient sulphate ions that may compete with selenate for transport sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fournier, E., Adam-Guillermin, C., Potin-Gautier, M., & Pannier, F.
Affiliations
  • Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (FR)
  • Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour (FR)
Corresponding author
Fournier, Elodie
Venue
Aquatic Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
51-57
ISSN
0166-445X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091283116
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aquatic Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Selenium in Biological Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, algal growth inhibition, EC50, dose-response relationship, Hill model, selenium transport, green algae
MeSH terms
Magnesium Sulfate, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Selenium Compounds, Selenic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review