Cited by 98Human-Animal Interaction StudiesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesArt Therapy and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PET-THERAPY: A TRIAL FOR INSTITUTIONALIZED FRAIL ELDERLY PATIENTS

STASI, M.F., AMATI, D., COSTA, C., RESTA, D., SENEPA, G., SCARAFIOITI, C., AIMONINO, N., MOLASCHI, M.·2004·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

Twenty-eight subjects with chronic age-related disabilities living in the nursing home"Istituto di Riposo per la Vecchiaia" in Torino were assigned to a pet-therapy intervention group, consisting of 3/week sessions of almost one-hour visit for 6 weeks with a little cat, of to a control group undergoing usual activity programs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of pet-therapy on nursing home inpatients. There were no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics and in mean duration of institutionalization between the two groups. Results showed that patients with animal interaction had improved depressive symptoms and a significant decrease in blood pressure values. The pet-therapy programs are desirable components of the multidisciplinary treatment for frail elderly patients in long-term care.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.052

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of 28 residents of an Italian nursing home, those who interacted with a cat did not have significant differences in Geriatric Depression Screen score or MMSE, but had 16-point lower systolic and 5-point lower diastolic blood pressure than those not exposed to the cat.

    “The individuals who interacted with a cat did not have any significant difference in Geriatric Depression Screen score, or cognition as measured by MMSE, but did have sixteen-point lower systolic blood pressure (P = 0.05) and five-point lower diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.05) than subjects who were not exposed to the cat.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
STASI, M. F., AMATI, D., COSTA, C., RESTA, D., SENEPA, G., SCARAFIOITI, C., AIMONINO, N., & MOLASCHI, M.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
STASI, M.F.
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
407-412
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110535027
Cited by
98
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
animal-assisted therapy, animal-assisted interventions, frail elderly, nursing home residents, institutionalized elderly, depressive symptoms, blood pressure, long-term care, multidisciplinary treatment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Human-Animal Bond, Depression, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Institutionalization, Male, Nursing Homes, Psychotherapy, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review