Cited by 67Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingBone health and osteoporosis research

Assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle mass by bioimpedance in older community-dwelling Korean adults

Kim, Jung Hee, Choi, Sung Hee, Lim, Soo, Kim, Ki Woong, Lim, Jae Young, Cho, Nam H., Park, Kyong Soo, Jang, Hak Chul·2014·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

It is crucial to investigate age-related body composition changes in geriatric medicine. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is easy to perform, non-invasive, relatively inexpensive, and portable. However, the accuracy of measurement by BIA is questionable. To develop and cross-validate the predictive equation for estimated appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) using BIA in older community-dwelling Korean adults, we include two cohorts: study participants aged 65-80 years in the Ansung cohort for the Korean Health and Genome Study (men, n=285; women, n=435) used as equation-generating group, and Korean Longitudinal Study of Health Aging (KLoSHA) as cross-validation group (men, n=202; women, n=208). Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and BIA were performed in both cohorts. Using multiple linear regression analysis, we drew a predictive equation for DXA-measured ASM by BIA resistance. From DXA and BIA measurements in the Ansung cohort, we generated the estimated equation ASM (kg)=[(Ht(2)/R×0.104)+(age×-0.050)+(gender×2.954)+(weight×0.055)]+5.663 where Ht is height in centimeters; R is BIA resistance in 250Ω; for gender, men=1 and women=0; and age is in years. We validated this equation in the KLoSHA. The r(2) of the estimated ASM was 0.890. This BIA equation provides valid estimates of ASM in older Korean adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archger.2013.11.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 67

Authors
Kim, J. H., Choi, S. H., Lim, S., Kim, K. W., Lim, J. Y., Cho, N. H., Park, K. S., & Jang, H. C.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Ajou University (KR)
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
303-307
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973390094
Cited by
67
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare, & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A092077)
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (02-2009-035)
  • National Research Foundation grant funded by the Korea Government (MEST) (2006-2005410)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
appendicular skeletal muscle mass, bioelectrical impedance analysis, prediction equations, equation validation, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, body composition, older adults, community-dwelling adults, Korean adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Male, Regression Analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Geriatric Assessment, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, Electric Impedance, Muscle, Skeletal, Asian People, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review