Assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle mass by bioimpedance in older community-dwelling Korean adults
Abstract
It is crucial to investigate age-related body composition changes in geriatric medicine. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is easy to perform, non-invasive, relatively inexpensive, and portable. However, the accuracy of measurement by BIA is questionable. To develop and cross-validate the predictive equation for estimated appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) using BIA in older community-dwelling Korean adults, we include two cohorts: study participants aged 65-80 years in the Ansung cohort for the Korean Health and Genome Study (men, n=285; women, n=435) used as equation-generating group, and Korean Longitudinal Study of Health Aging (KLoSHA) as cross-validation group (men, n=202; women, n=208). Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and BIA were performed in both cohorts. Using multiple linear regression analysis, we drew a predictive equation for DXA-measured ASM by BIA resistance. From DXA and BIA measurements in the Ansung cohort, we generated the estimated equation ASM (kg)=[(Ht(2)/R×0.104)+(age×-0.050)+(gender×2.954)+(weight×0.055)]+5.663 where Ht is height in centimeters; R is BIA resistance in 250Ω; for gender, men=1 and women=0; and age is in years. We validated this equation in the KLoSHA. The r(2) of the estimated ASM was 0.890. This BIA equation provides valid estimates of ASM in older Korean adults.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four equations for elderly are for assessing appendicular LSM.
“There is one equation for estimating BCM [63], four equations for assessing appendicular LSM [46, 67, 92, 93], and one equation for assessing SMM [95] suitable for males and females.”
From High-standard predictive equations for estimating body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [92]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Kim, J. H., Choi, S. H., Lim, S., Kim, K. W., Lim, J. Y., Cho, N. H., Park, K. S., & Jang, H. C.
- Affiliations
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Ajou University (KR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-307
- ISSN
- 0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973390094
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare, & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A092077)
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (02-2009-035)
- National Research Foundation grant funded by the Korea Government (MEST) (2006-2005410)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Keywords
- appendicular skeletal muscle mass, bioelectrical impedance analysis, prediction equations, equation validation, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, body composition, older adults, community-dwelling adults, Korean adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Male, Regression Analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Geriatric Assessment, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, Electric Impedance, Muscle, Skeletal, Asian People, Republic of Korea
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review