The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human factors in production and logistics systems of the future
Open accessAbstract
The way humans work in production and logistics systems is changing. The evolution of technologies, Industry 4.0 applications, and societal changes, such as ageing workforces, are transforming operations processes. This transformation is still a “black-box” for many companies, and there are calls for new management approaches that can help to successfully overcome the future challenges in production and logistics. While Industry 4.0 emerges, companies have started to use advanced control tools enabled by real-time monitoring systems that allow the development of more accurate planning models that enable proactive managerial decision-making. Although we observe an increasing trend in automating human work in almost every industry, human workers are still playing a central role in many production and logistics systems. Many of these planning models developed for managerial decision support, however, do not consider human factors and their impact on system or employee performance, leading to inaccurate planning results and decisions, underperforming systems, and increased health hazards for employees. This paper summarizes the vision, challenges and opportunities in this research field, based on the experience of the authors, members of the Working Group 7 (WG7) “Human factors and ergonomics in industrial and logistic system design and management” of the IFAC Technical Committee (TC) 5.2 “ Manufacturing Modelling for Management and Control ". We also discuss the development of this research stream in light of the contributions presented in invited sessions at related IFAC conferences over the last five years. The TC 5.2 framework is adapted to include a human-centered perspective. Based on this discussion, a research agenda is developed that highlights the potential benefits and future requirements for academia and society in this emerging research field. Promising directions for future research on human factors in production and logistics systems include the consideration of diversity of human workers and an in-depth integration of Industry 4.0 technologies in operations processes to support the development of smart, sustainable, human-centered systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 · Cited by 3,221
Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal
Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576 · Cited by 2,036
Design and Control of Warehouse Order Picking: a literature reviewPreprint
de Koster, R. B. M., Le-Duc, T., & Roodbergen, K. J. (n.d.) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,961
Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review
Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140 · Cited by 1,501
Logistics 4.0: a systematic review towards a new logistics system
Winkelhaus, S., & Grosse, E. H. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1612964 · Cited by 797
Self-citationOn the Interface Between Operations and Human Resources Management
Boudreau, J., Hopp, W., McClain, J. O., & Thomas, L. J. (2003) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.5.3.179.16032 · Cited by 451
Big data applications in operations/supply-chain management: A literature review
Addo-Tenkorang, R., & Helo, P. T. (2016) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.023 · Cited by 400
Incorporating human factors in order picking planning models: framework and research opportunities
Grosse, E. H., Glock, C. H., Jaber, M. Y., & Neumann, W. P. (2015) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.919424 · Cited by 373
Self-citationChallenges for the cyber-physical manufacturing enterprises of the future
Panetto, H., Iung, B., Ivanov, D., Weichhart, G., & Wang, X. (2019) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.02.002 · Cited by 332
Presenteeism: A review and research directions
Lohaus, D., & Habermann, W. (2019) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.010 · Cited by 317
Cited by
Ivanov, D. (2023) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2022.2118892 · Cited by 833
Human-centered design of work systems in the transition to industry 4.0
Kadir, B. A., & Broberg, O. (2021) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103334 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Sgarbossa, F., Grosse, E. H., Neumann, W. P., Battini, D., & Glock, C. H.
- Venue
- Annual Reviews in Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 49
- Pages
- 295-305
- ISSN
- 1367-5788 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3025383415
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 12.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human factors in production and logistics systems of the future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.007
- The paper
- Sgarbossa, F., Grosse, E. H., Neumann, W. P., Battini, D., & Glock, C. H. (2020). Human factors in production and logistics systems of the future. Annual Reviews in Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.