The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives
Abstract
Industry 5.0 is a combination of organisational principles and technologies to design and manage operations and supply chains as resilient, sustainable, and human-centric systems. While the general notion of Industry 5.0 has been elaborated, its implications for future operations and supply chains remain underexplored. This paper contributes to the conceptualisation of Industry 5.0 from the perspective of viability. We contextualise a framework of Industry 5.0 through the lens of the viable supply chain model, the reconfigurable supply chain, and human-centric ecosystems. Our study uncovers the major dimensions that characterise Industry 5.0 as a technological-organisational framework. First, the major technological principles of Industry 5.0 are collaboration, coordination, communication, automation, data analytics processing, and identification. Second, Industry 5.0 covers four areas: organisation, management, technology, and performance assessment. Third, Industry 5.0 spans three levels: society level, network level, and plant level. Last but not least, Industry 5.0 frames a new triple bottom line: resilient value creation, human well-being, and sustainable society. We provide a definition of Industry 5.0 and discuss its implications by elaborating on the understanding of value in Industry 5.0, which spans the dimensions of profit, people, and society. We also discuss open research areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
Self-citationIvanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 · Cited by 2,055
Self-citationDigital technologies in product-service systems: a literature review and a research agenda
Pirola, F., Boucher, X., Wiesner, S., & Pezzotta, G. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103301 · Cited by 252
Human-Oriented Assembly Line Balancing and Sequencing Model in the Industry 4.0 Era
Battini, D., Finco, S., & Sgarbossa, F. (2020) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43177-8_8 · Cited by 13
Cited by
Is Industry 5.0 a Human-Centred Approach? A Systematic Review
Alves, J., Lima, T. M., & Gaspar, P. D. (2023) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr11010193 · Cited by 359
Dey, P. K., Chowdhury, S., Abadie, A., Vann Yaroson, E., & Sarkar, S. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859 · Cited by 330
Intelligent digital twin (iDT) for supply chain stress-testing, resilience, and viability
Ivanov, D. (2023) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108938 · Cited by 270
Self-citationSheik, A. G., Kumar, A., Ansari, F. A., Raj, V., Peleato, N. M., Patan, A. K., Kumari, S., & Bux, F. (2024) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2024.103779 · Cited by 37
Vlachos, I., & Graham, G. (2025) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2025.2553824 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivanov, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-09-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1683-1695
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W4295249297
- Cited by
- 833
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 68.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207543.2022.2118892
- The paper
- Ivanov, D. (2023). The Industry 5.0 framework: viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2118892
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.