Cited by 157Muscle Physiology and DisordersNutrition and Health in AgingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 178 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Skeletal muscle regeneration and impact of aging and nutrition

Domingues-Faria, Carla, Vasson, Marie-Paule, Goncalves-Mendes, Nicolas, Boirie, Yves, Walrand, Stephane·2016·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

After skeletal muscle injury a regeneration process takes place to repair muscle. Skeletal muscle recovery is a highly coordinated process involving cross-talk between immune and muscle cells. It is well known that the physiological activities of both immune cells and muscle stem cells decline with advancing age, thereby blunting the capacity of skeletal muscle to regenerate. The age-related reduction in muscle repair efficiency contributes to the development of sarcopenia, one of the most important factors of disability in elderly people. Preserving muscle regeneration capacity may slow the development of this syndrome. In this context, nutrition has drawn much attention: studies have demonstrated that nutrients such as amino acids, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, polyphenols and vitamin D can improve skeletal muscle regeneration by targeting key functions of immune cells, muscle cells or both. Here we review the process of skeletal muscle regeneration with a special focus on the cross-talk between immune and muscle cells. We address the effect of aging on immune and skeletal muscle cells involved in muscle regeneration. Finally, the mechanisms of nutrient action on muscle regeneration are described, showing that quality of nutrition may help to preserve the capacity for skeletal muscle regeneration with age.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2015.12.004

Cites

176 of 176 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 178 references

2 of the 178 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ciciliot, 2010, Regeneration of mammalian skeletal muscle, Basic Mech. Clin. Implic. Curr. Pharm. Des., 16, 906

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–157 of 157

Metadata

Authors
Domingues-Faria, C., Vasson, M.-P., Goncalves-Mendes, N., Boirie, Y., & Walrand, S.
Affiliations
Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
26
Pages
22-36
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2193057007
Cited by
157
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
skeletal muscle regeneration, muscle aging, sarcopenia, muscle stem cells, immune cells, nutrition, amino acids, omega-3 fatty acids, polyphenols, vitamin D, muscle injury repair
MeSH terms
Immunosenescence, Aging, Humans, Nutritional Status, Regeneration, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review