Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in frail and pre-frail older adults: Results from a meta-analysis and exploratory meta-regression analysis

Open access
Veronese, Nicola, Cereda, Emanuele, Stubbs, Brendon, Solmi, Marco, Luchini, Claudio, Manzato, Enzo, Sergi, Giuseppe, Manu, Peter, Harris, Tamara, Fontana, Luigi, Strandberg, Timo, Amieva, Helene, Dumurgier, Julien, Elbaz, Alexis, Tzourio, Christophe, Eicholzer, Monika, Rohrmann, Sabine, Moretti, Claudio, D’Ascenzo, Fabrizio, Quadri, Giorgio, Polidoro, Alessandro, Lourenço, Roberto Alves, Moreira, Virgilio Garcia, Sanchis, Juan, Scotti, Valeria, Maggi, Stefania, Correll, Christoph U.·2017·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

Frailty is common and associated with poorer outcomes in the elderly, but its role as potential cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor requires clarification. We thus aimed to meta-analytically evaluate the evidence of frailty and pre-frailty as risk factors for CVD. Two reviewers selected all studies comparing data about CVD prevalence or incidence rates between frail/pre-frail vs. robust. The association between frailty status and CVD in cross-sectional studies was explored by calculating and pooling crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) ±95% confidence intervals (CIs); the data from longitudinal studies were pooled using the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). Eighteen cohorts with a total of 31,343 participants were meta-analyzed. Using estimates from 10 cross-sectional cohorts, both frailty and pre-frailty were associated with higher odds of CVD than robust participants. Longitudinal data were obtained from 6 prospective cohort studies. After a median follow-up of 4.4 years, we identified an increased risk for faster onset of any-type CVD in the frail (HR=1.70 [95%CI, 1.18–2.45]; I2=66%) and pre-frail (HR=1.23 [95%CI, 1.07–1.36]; I2=67%) vs. robust groups. Similar results were apparent for time to CVD mortality in the frail and pre-frail groups. In conclusion, frailty and pre-frailty constitute addressable and independent risk factors for CVD in older adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.003

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Veronese, N., Cereda, E., Stubbs, B., Solmi, M., Luchini, C., Manzato, E., Sergi, G., Manu, P., Harris, T., Fontana, L., Strandberg, T., Amieva, H., Dumurgier, J., Elbaz, A., Tzourio, C., Eicholzer, M., Rohrmann, S., Moretti, C., D’Ascenzo, F., Quadri, G., Polidoro, A., Lourenço, R. A., Moreira, V. G., Sanchis, J., Scotti, V., Maggi, S., & Correll, C. U.
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
35
Pages
63-73
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2582378536
Cited by
305
References
79
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in frail and pre-frail older adults: Results from a meta-analysis and exploratory meta-regression analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.003
The paper
Veronese, N., Cereda, E., Stubbs, B., Solmi, M., Luchini, C., Manzato, E., Sergi, G., Manu, P., Harris, T., Fontana, L., Strandberg, T., Amieva, H., Dumurgier, J., Elbaz, A., Tzourio, C., Eicholzer, M., Rohrmann, S., Moretti, C., D’Ascenzo, F., . . . Correll, C. U. (2017). Risk of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in frail and pre-frail older adults: Results from a meta-analysis and exploratory meta-regression analysis. Ageing Research Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.