The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion
Open accessAbstract
Multi-modality is widely used in medical imaging, because it can provide multiinformation about a target (tumor, organ or tissue). Segmentation using multimodality consists of fusing multi-information to improve the segmentation. Recently, deep learning-based approaches have presented the state-of-the-art performance in image classification, segmentation, object detection and tracking tasks. Due to their self-learning and generalization ability over large amounts of data, deep learning recently has also gained great interest in multi-modal medical image segmentation. In this paper, we give an overview of deep learning-based approaches for multi-modal medical image segmentation task. Firstly, we introduce the general principle of deep learning and multi-modal medical image segmentation. Secondly, we present different deep learning network architectures, then analyze their fusion strategies and compare their results. The earlier fusion is commonly used, since it’s simple and it focuses on the subsequent segmentation network architecture. However, the later fusion gives more attention on fusion strategy to learn the complex relationship between different modalities. In general, compared to the earlier fusion, the later fusion can give more accurate result if the fusion method is effective enough. We also discuss some common problems in medical image segmentation. Finally, we summarize and provide some perspectives on the future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollar, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.324 · Cited by 30,581
Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks
Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.632 · Cited by 22,930
Self-citationDelving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Cited by
Medical image segmentation using deep learning: A survey
Wang, R., Lei, T., Cui, R., Zhang, B., Meng, H., & Nandi, A. K. (2022) · IET Image Processing · doi:10.1049/ipr2.12419 · Cited by 892
Deep semantic segmentation of natural and medical images: a review
Asgari Taghanaki, S., Abhishek, K., Cohen, J. P., Cohen-Adad, J., & Hamarneh, G. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09854-1 · Cited by 870
Zhao, F., Zhang, C., & Geng, B. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3649447 · Cited by 480
Azam, M. A., Khan, K. B., Salahuddin, S., Rehman, E., Khan, S. A., Khan, M. A., Kadry, S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105253 · Cited by 449
U-Net-Based Medical Image Segmentation
Yin, X.-X., Sun, L., Fu, Y., Lu, R., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/4189781 · Cited by 318
RetractedDeep learning based multimodal biomedical data fusion: an overview and comparative review
Duan, J., Xiong, J., Li, Y., & Ding, W. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102536 · Cited by 284
Li, Y., El Habib Daho, M., Conze, P.-H., Zeghlache, R., Le Boité, H., Tadayoni, R., Cochener, B., Lamard, M., & Quellec, G. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108635 · Cited by 274
Deep multimodal fusion for semantic image segmentation: A survey
Zhang, Y., Sidibé, D., Morel, O., & Mériaudeau, F. (2021) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2020.104042 · Cited by 261
Multi-modality approaches for medical support systems: A systematic review of the last decade
Salvi, M., Loh, H. W., Seoni, S., Barua, P. D., García, S., Molinari, F., & Acharya, U. R. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.102134 · Cited by 144
A systematic review of intermediate fusion in multimodal deep learning for biomedical applications
Guarrasi, V., Aksu, F., Caruso, C. M., Di Feola, F., Rofena, A., Ruffini, F., & Soda, P. (2025) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2025.105509 · Cited by 95
Zhang, Y., Pan, Y., Zhong, T., Dong, P., Xie, K., Liu, Y., Jiang, H., Wu, Z., Liu, Z., Zhao, W., et al. (2024) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2024.100103 · Cited by 52
Unbiased Missing-Modality Multimodal Learning
Dai, R., Li, C., Yan, Y., Mo, L., Qin, K., & He, T. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.02272 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, T., Ruan, S., & Canu, S.
- Venue
- Array
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 3-4
- Pages
- 100004
- ISSN
- 2590-0056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2970546341
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 33.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
