A review on multimodal medical image fusion: compendious analysis of medical modalities, multimodal databases, fusion techniques and quality metrics
Abstract
Background and objectives Over the past two decades, medical imaging has been extensively apply to diagnose diseases. Medical experts continue to have difficulties for diagnosing diseases with a single modality owing to a lack of information in this domain. Image fusion may be use to merge images of specific organs with diseases from a variety of medical imaging systems. Anatomical and physiological data may be included in multi-modality image fusion, making diagnosis simpler. It is a difficult challenge to find the best multimodal medical database with fusion quality evaluation for assessing recommended image fusion methods. As a result, this article provides a complete overview of multimodal medical image fusion methodologies, databases, and quality measurements. Methods In this article, a compendious review of different medical imaging modalities and evaluation of related multimodal databases along with the statistical results is provided. The medical imaging modalities are organized based on radiation, visible-light imaging, microscopy, and multimodal imaging. Results The medical imaging acquisition is categorized into invasive or non-invasive techniques. The fusion techniques are classified into six main categories: frequency fusion, spatial fusion, decision-level fusion, deep learning, hybrid fusion, and sparse representation fusion. In addition, the associated diseases for each modality and fusion approach presented. The quality assessments fusion metrics are also encapsulated in this article. Conclusions This survey provides a baseline guideline to medical experts in this technical domain that may combine preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative imaging, Multi-sensor fusion for disease detection, etc. The advantages and drawbacks of the current literature are discussed, and future insights are provided accordingly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The concept of multimodal medical image fusion (MMIF) analysis has been proposed, which involves integrating images from different examination methods in the frequency domain, at spatial pixel level, or by merging decisions for individual image modalities.
“To better understand the pathology of diseases, the concept of multimodal medical image fusion (MMIF) analysis has been proposed, which involves integrating images from different examination methods in the frequency domain, at spatial pixel level, or by merging decisions for individual image modalities [92]”
From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [92]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep learning based multimodal biomedical data fusion: an overview and comparative review
Duan, J., Xiong, J., Li, Y., & Ding, W. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102536 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Li, Y., El Habib Daho, M., Conze, P.-H., Zeghlache, R., Le Boité, H., Tadayoni, R., Cochener, B., Lamard, M., & Quellec, G. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108635 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence-based methods for fusion of electronic health records and imaging data
Mohsen, F., Ali, H., El Hajj, N., & Shah, Z. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22514-4 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Review of multimodal machine learning approaches in healthcare
Krones, F., Marikkar, U., Parsons, G., Szmul, A., & Mahdi, A. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102690 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis
Liu, J., Cen, X., Yi, C., Wang, F.-A., Ding, J., Cheng, J., Wu, Q., Gai, B., Zhou, Y., He, R., et al. (2025) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/gpbjnl/qzaf011 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Advanced Neural Networks for Multimodal Data Fusion in Interdisciplinary Research
Dhivya, K., Kumar, S. N., Victoria, D. R. S., Sherly, S. I., & Durgadevi, G. (2024) · Advances in IT Standards and Standardization Research · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-4759-1.ch008 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A Novel Prediction Model for Multimodal Medical Data Based on Graph Neural Networks
Zhang, L., Li, T., Cui, H., Zhang, Q., Jiang, Z., Li, J., Welsch, R. E., & Jia, Z. (2025) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make7030092 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Azam, M. A., Khan, K. B., Salahuddin, S., Rehman, E., Khan, S. A., Khan, M. A., Kadry, S., & Gandomi, A. H.
- Affiliations
- Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
- Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK)
- Foundation University Islamabad (PK)
- HITEC University (PK)
- Noroff University College (NO)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gandomi, Amir H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computers in Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 105253
- ISSN
- 0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4210385745
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 98 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- multimodal medical image fusion, medical imaging modalities, fusion quality metrics, frequency domain fusion, spatial domain fusion, decision fusion, deep learning fusion, hybrid fusion, disease detection, multi-sensor fusion
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Benchmarking, Multimodal Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review