Screening for beta-lactam allergy in joint arthroplasty patients to improve surgical prophylaxis practice.
Abstract
Background The reliability of patient-reported penicillin allergies has been disputed. A Drug Allergy Clinic (DAC) was established at our institution in combination with an electronic best practice alert (BPA) in the Orthopedic Clinic. Joint arthroplasty patients with a reported history of beta-lactam allergy (HOBA) were preoperatively referred via the BPA to the DAC. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of beta-lactam allergy screening in enabling the surgical team to optimize antimicrobial prophylaxis.Methods Between February 2013 and May 2015, 161 patients with a HOBA were referred to the DAC where they underwent penicillin skin testing (PST), a drug challenge to a beta-lactam antibiotic, and/or had no intervention depending on the history obtained.Results PST was performed on 140 of 161 (87%) patients. A negative PST was noted in 139 (99%) patients, indicating no penicillin allergy. Cefazolin was safe to use in 145 (90%) patients evaluated. Significantly more patients evaluated in the DAC vs those not seen got cefazolin in any surgical prophylaxis regimen (90% vs 77%) without any adverse perioperative reactions. Concurrently, the use of non-beta-lactam antibiotics was significantly less in the patients evaluated vs not evaluated (16% vs 27%). The overall use of cefazolin in orthopedic surgeries in patients with HOBA was >84% over the course of the study period.Conclusion Beta-lactam allergy screening using a BPA and a DAC promotes the use of standard surgical prophylaxis with cefazolin. Joint arthroplasty surgeons should consider implementing allergy screening programs to promote antimicrobial stewardship.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies in preoperative surgical patients with reported penicillin allergy, evaluated for cardiovascular surgery or orthopedics, have rates of skin test positivity <8.5%.
“Studies in preoperative surgical patients with reported penicillin allergy, evaluated for cardiovascular surgery (668) or orthopedics (669), have rates of skin test positivity <8.5%.”
From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [669]
Cites
Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery
Bratzler, D. W., Dellinger, E. P., Olsen, K. M., Perl, T. M., Auwaerter, P. G., Bolon, M. K., Fish, D. N., Napolitano, L. M., Sawyer, R. G., Slain, D., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp120568 · Cited by 2,600 · see citing works
Bozic, K. J., Ward, L., Vail, T. P., et al. (2013) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3034-3 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Pichichero, M. E. (2005) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1276 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
(1995) · PubMed · Cited by 203 · see citing works
A Perspective on Penicillin Allergy
Lin, R. Y.-W. (1992) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1992.00400170020005 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Park, M., Markus, P. J., Matešić, D., & Li, J. T. C. (2006) · Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1081-1206(10)61100-3 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
PART 1: Executive Summary of Disease Management of Drug Hypersensitivity: A Practice Parameter
(1999) · Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1081-1206(10)62890-6 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Are Bundled Payments a Viable Reimbursement Model for Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Courtney, M. P., Ashley, B. S., Hume, E. L., et al. (2016) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4953-6 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Reduction of Vancomycin Use in Orthopedic Patients With a History of Antibiotic Allergy
Li, J. T. C., Markus, P. J., Osmon, D. R., Estes, L. L., Gosselin, V. A., & Hanssen, A. D. (2000) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/75.9.902 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Penicillin allergy: A practical guide for clinicians
Gonzalez‐Estrada, A., & Radojicic, C. (2015) · Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine · doi:10.3949/ccjm.82a.14111 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Frigas, E., Park, M. A., Narr, B. J., Volcheck, G. W., Danielson, D. R., Markus, P. J., Olson, K. E. K., Schroeder, D. R., & Kita, H. (2008) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/83.6.651 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Phillips, E., Louie, M., Knowles, S. R., et al. (2000) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.1093/ajhp/57.4.339 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Penicillin skin testing in cardiac surgery.
Cook, D. J., Barbara, D. W., Singh, K. E., & Dearani, J. A. (2014) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.019 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Haslam, S. P., Yen, D., Dvirnik, N., et al. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Benefits of Negative Penicillin Skin Test Results Persist during Subsequent Hospital Admissions
Perencevich, E. N., Weller, P. F., Samore, M. H., & Harris, A. D. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/318450 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021
Workowski, K. A., Bachmann, L. H., Chan, P. A., Johnston, C. M., Muzny, C. A., Park, I., Reno, H., Zenilman, J. M., & Bolan, G. A. (2021) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1 · Cited by 2,759 · see citing works
Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review
Shenoy, E. S., Macy, E., Rowe, T., & Blumenthal, K. G. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19283 · Cited by 830 · see citing works
Blumenthal, K. G., Peter, J. G., Trubiano, J. A., & Phillips, E. J. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32218-9 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
The impact of a reported penicillin allergy on surgical site infection risk.
Blumenthal, K. G., Ryan, E. E., Li, Y., Lee, H., Kuhlen, J. L., & Shenoy, E. S. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cix794 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
- Authors
- McDanel, D. L., Azar, A. E., Dowden, A. M., Murray-Bainer, S., Noiseux, N. O., Willenborg, M., Clark, C. R., Callaghan, J. J., & Haleem, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Callaghan, John J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- S101-S108
- ISSN
- 0883-5403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2578433192
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Arthroplasty (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
- Keywords
- beta-lactam allergy, allergy screening, arthroplasty, cefazolin, penicillin skin testing, drug challenge, antibiotic prophylaxis, antimicrobial stewardship
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Infective Agents, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Arthroplasty, Cefazolin, Drug Hypersensitivity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Penicillins, Retrospective Studies, Skin Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Antibiotic Prophylaxis, Arthroplasty, Replacement, beta-Lactams
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review