Use and Application of Large Language Models for Patient Questions Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Abstract
Background A consumer-focused health care model not only allows unprecedented access to information, but equally warrants consideration of the appropriateness of providing accurate patient health information. Nurses play a large role in influencing patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but they come at a cost. A specific natural language artificial intelligence (AI) model, ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer), has accumulated over 100 million users within months of launching. As such, we aimed to compare: (1) orthopaedic surgeons' evaluation of the appropriateness of the answers to the most frequently asked patient questions after TKA; and (2) patients' comfort level in answering their postoperative questions by using answers provided by arthroplasty-trained nurses and ChatGPT. Methods We prospectively created 60 questions based on the most commonly asked patient questions following TKA. There were 3 fellowship-trained surgeons who assessed the answers provided by arthroplasty-trained nurses and ChatGPT-4 to each of the questions. The surgeons graded each set of responses based on clinical judgment as: (1) "appropriate," (2) "inappropriate" if the response contained inappropriate information, or (3) "unreliable," if the responses provided inconsistent content. Patients' comfort level and trust in AI were assessed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) hosted at our local hospital. Results The surgeons graded 44 out of 60 (73.3%) r…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients recovering from knee surgery were more likely to prefer ChatGPT's responses over those provided by nurses when the content was perceived as credible.
“This aligns with Bains et al.'s (2024) research that showed that patients recovering from knee surgery were more likely to prefer ChatGPT's responses over those provided by nurses when the content was perceived as credible.”
From Perceived Search Overload, Generative AI Credibility, and Comparative Usefulness: A Channel Complementarity Approach to Health Information Seeking (2025) · cites this paper as Bains et al. (2024)
When GenAI-generated content is perceived as credible and reassuring, patients are more inclined to trust and adopt GenAI tools in healthcare services.
“Their study showed that when GenAI-generated content is perceived as credible and reassuring, patients are more inclined to trust and adopt GenAI tools in healthcare services.”
From Perceived Search Overload, Generative AI Credibility, and Comparative Usefulness: A Channel Complementarity Approach to Health Information Seeking (2025) · cites this paper as Bains et al. (2024)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 36 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Bains, S. S., Dubin, J. A., Hameed, D., Sax, O. C., Douglas, S., Mont, M. A., Nace, J., & Delanois, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Sinai Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Delanois, Ronald E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2289-2294
- ISSN
- 0883-5403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392779412
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Arthroplasty (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Keywords
- total knee arthroplasty, ChatGPT, large language models, patient questions, postoperative patient education, patient trust in AI, patient comfort, consumer health information, patient satisfaction, patient-provider communication, ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-3.5
- MeSH terms
- Orthopedic Surgeons, Aged, Artificial Intelligence, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient Satisfaction, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review