The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging Findings in Asymptomatic Volunteers: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of radiographic findings suggestive of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in asymptomatic individuals. Methods: A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting radiographic, computed tomographic, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that were suggestive of FAI in asymptomatic volunteers were included. Cam, pincer, and combined pathologic conditions were investigated. Results: We identified 26 studies for inclusion, comprising 2,114 asymptomatic hips (57.2% men; 42.8% women). The mean participant age was 25.3 ± 1.5 years. The mean alpha angle in asymptomatic hips was 54.1° ± 5.1°. The prevalence of an asymptomatic cam deformity was 37% (range, 7% to 100% between studies)—54.8% in athletes versus 23.1% in the general population. Of the 17 studies that measured alpha angles, 9 used MRI and 9 used radiography (1 study used both). The mean lateral and anterior center edge angles (CEAs) were 31.2° and 30°, respectively. The prevalence of asymptomatic hips with pincer deformity was 67% (range 61% to 76% between studies). Pincer deformity was poorly defined (4 studies [15%]; focal anterior overcoverage, acetabular retroversion, abnormal CEA or acetabular index, coxa profunda, acetabular protrusio, ischial spine sign, crossover sign, and posterior wall sign). Only 7 studies reported on labral injury, which was found on MRI without intra‐articular contrast in 68.1% of hips. Conclusions: FAI morphologic features and labral injuries are common in asymptomatic patients. Clinical decision making should carefully analyze the association of patient history and physical examination with radiographic imaging. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review if Level II‐IV studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In physical medicine, a large body of research supports the perspective that tissue disruption alone is not enough to explain pain or dysfunction (Beecher, 1946;Brinjikji et al., 2015;Frank et al., 2015;Teunis et al., 2014).”
From Beyond yellow flags: The Big‐Five personality traits and psychologically informed musculoskeletal rehabilitation. (2023) · cites this paper as Frank et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.5435/00124635-201300001-00004 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.blo.0000246536.90371.12 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.blo.0000181147.86058.74 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11999-010-1539-6 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.blo.0000136903.01368.20 · DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.H.00756 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546513499227 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00256-012-1544-9 · DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.K.01664 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.024 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546513483448 · DOI
- 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182518d57 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.008 · DOI
- 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)10 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546512439991 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546512462124 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546512441328 · DOI
- 10.1002/jor.21371 · DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.K.00544 · DOI
- 10.1002/jmri.22528 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11420-010-9192-x · DOI
- 10.1002/art.30589 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546510388931 · DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.J.01280 · DOI
- 10.1002/acr.20198 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.016 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.22166 · DOI
- 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.22028 · DOI
- 10.1002/mrm.21190 · DOI
- 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180f60b53 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.joca.2006.03.017 · DOI
- 10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819406 · DOI
- 10.5435/00124635-201300001-00005 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11999-011-1945-4 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546514524364 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.03.011.1100230608 · DOI
- 10.1302/0301-620X.84B4.0840556 · DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.I.00326 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-013-2678-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/jor.22086 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11999-012-2689-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00330-010-1956-7 · DOI
- 10.2214/AJR.07.3669 · DOI
- Reurink G., 2012, Reliability and validity of diagnosing acetabular labral lesions with magnetic resonance arthrography, J Bone Joint Surg Am., 94
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Griffin, D. R., Dickenson, E. J., O’Donnell, J., Agricola, R., Awan, T. M., Beck, M., Clohisy, J. C. F., Dijkstra, H. P., Falvey, É. C., Gimpel, M., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096743 · Cited by 1,057
Palmer, A. J. R., Gupta, V. A., Fernquest, S. J., Rombach, I., Dutton, S., Mansour, R. M., Wood, S., Khanduja, V., Pollard, T. C. B., McCaskie, A. W., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l185 · Cited by 289
Hip Osteoarthritis: Etiopathogenesis and Implications for Management
Murphy, N. J., Eyles, J. P., & Hunter, D. J. (2016) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0409-3 · Cited by 287
“A systematic review found that radiographic evidence of pincer-type morphology is present in almost two–thirds of the population [48], although this figure is likely inflated because of the poor reliability and specificity of many of the radiographic signs considered suggestive of pincer morphology [51].”
BackgroundThe Human Pelvis: Variation in structure and function during gait
Lewis, C. L., Laudicina, N. M., Khuu, A., & Loverro, K. (2017) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.23552 · Cited by 176
“While a center edge angle greater than 40 degrees or the presence of coxa profunda are commonly thought to indicate abnormal acetabular geometry, the prevalence of pincer deformity detected in asymptomatic hips is approximately 67% (Frank et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMetabolomics in rheumatic diseases: desperately seeking biomarkers
Gumá, M., Tiziani, S., & Firestein, G. S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.1 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Frank, J. M., Harris, J. D., Erickson, B. J., Slikker, W., Bush‐Joseph, C. A., Salata, M. J., & Nho, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Frank, Jonathan M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Arthroscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-28
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1199-1204
- ISSN
- 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-3231
- OpenAlex
- W2027317771
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 24
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Keywords
- femoroacetabular impingement, prevalence, cam deformity, alpha angle, center-edge angle, acetabular index, labral lesions, hip morphology, athletes
- MeSH terms
- Diagnostic Imaging, Hip Joint, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Global Health, Prevalence, Femoracetabular Impingement, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review