The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcomes After Labral Repair in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and Borderline Dysplasia
Abstract
Purpose: To determine outcomes after labral repair in patients with borderline dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Methods: Patients with dysplasia treated between June 2005 and March 2009 were identified. The study included only patients aged 18 years or older (mean, 35 years; range, 18 to 69 years) whose affected hip had a Wiberg center‐edge angle of 20° to 25° and who underwent primary hip arthroscopy performed by the senior author. Results: One hundred two hips (100 patients, comprising 50 women and 50 men) underwent hip arthroscopy with labral repair with correction of FAI and capsular closure. Five hips were converted to total hip arthroplasty, and 7 required revision arthroscopy. Of 95 patients (representing 100 hips, 5 of which underwent total hip arthroplasty), 80 were monitored for a minimum of 2 years. At a mean follow‐up point of 40 months, the preoperative modified Harris Hip Score had improved from a mean of 63.5 points (range, 20 to 98 points) to a mean of 84.9 points (range, 45 to 100 points) by the latest follow‐up ( P < .001). The mean score on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index improved from 25.3 (range, 0 to 60) to 9.7 (range, 0 to 59) ( P < .001). The 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary score also significantly improved (from 42.5 to 50.9, P = .001), whereas the 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Health Component Summary score showed an insignificant improvement (from 52.4 to 54.1). Conclusions: This study showed that FAI and labral pathology can be successfully managed using hip arthroscopy, with capsular management, in patients with borderline dysplasia. Patients showed significant improvements in outcomes and high levels of satisfaction after hip arthroscopy. The need for subsequent procedures was similar to that in patients with just FAI and labral repair. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Second, the definition of borderline dysplasia remains unclear.”
From Femoral head translation in borderline and definite dysplastic hips during weight‐bearing: 2D/3D image registration analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.05.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.07.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.059 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1302/0301-620X.91B1.21329 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.07.004 · DOI
- Wiberg G., 1939, Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint, Acta Chir Scand, 83, 7
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546513499154 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5301/hip.2011.7422 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.01.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.12.005 · DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.G.01367 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-014-2875-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.057 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546514548017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.004 · DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.H.00756 · DOI
- 10.1302/0301-620X.84B4.0840556 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.blo.0000246536.90371.12 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csm.2010.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.11.003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546511413746 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csm.2005.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csm.2011.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00167-013-2728-0 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546514526357 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sakai, S., Kutsuna, T., Kono, K., Kinoshita, T., Mashima, N., & Takao, M. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics · doi:10.1186/s40634-023-00707-8 · Cited by 16
“[5], while borderline dysplasia is often defined as 20° ≤ CE angle 25° [7].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fukui, K., Briggs, K. K., Trindade, C. A. C., & Philippon, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Briggs, Karen K.
- Venue
- Arthroscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-24
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2371-2379
- ISSN
- 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-3231
- OpenAlex
- W1628091765
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Keywords
- femoroacetabular impingement, borderline dysplasia, hip arthroscopy, capsular closure, modified Harris Hip Score, patient-reported outcomes, revision arthroscopy, total hip arthroplasty
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Arthroscopy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hip Dislocation, Hip Joint, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reoperation, Treatment Outcome, Joint Capsule, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Fibrocartilage, Young Adult, Femoracetabular Impingement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review