The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue
Walker, M. A., Whittaker, S. J., Stent, A., Maloor, P., Moore, J., Johnston, M., & Vasireddy, G. (2004) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.06.002 · Cited by 125
Cited by
Doré, T., Makowski, D., Malézieux, E., Munier-Jolain, N., Tchamitchian, M., & Tittonell, P. (2011) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.006 · Cited by 474
Artificial Intelligence in the 21st Century
Liu, J., Kong, X., Xia, F., Bai, X., Wang, L., Qing, Q., & Lee, I. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2819688 · Cited by 270
Nobel Turing Challenge: creating the engine for scientific discovery
Kitano, H. (2021) · npj Systems Biology and Applications · doi:10.1038/s41540-021-00189-3 · Cited by 149
Toward Artificial Argumentation
Atkinson, K., Baroni, P., Giacomin, M., Hunter, A., Prakken, H., Reed, C., Simari, G., Thimm, M., & Villata, S. (2017) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2704 · Cited by 142
Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogue
Bex, F., & Walton, D. (2016) · Argument & Computation · doi:10.3233/aac-160001 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 10-15
- Pages
- 619-641
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121835362
- Cited by
- 803
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001
- The paper
- Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2007). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
