The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-instance multi-label learning
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose the MIML (Multi-Instance Multi-Label learning) framework where an example is described by multiple instances and associated with multiple class labels. Compared to traditional learning frameworks, the MIML framework is more convenient and natural for representing complicated objects which have multiple semantic meanings. To learn from MIML examples, we propose the MimlBoost and MimlSvm algorithms based on a simple degeneration strategy, and experiments show that solving problems involving complicated objects with multiple semantic meanings in the MIML framework can lead to good performance. Considering that the degeneration process may lose information, we propose the D-MimlSvm algorithm which tackles MIML problems directly in a regularization framework. Moreover, we show that even when we do not have access to the real objects and thus cannot capture more information from real objects by using the MIML representation, MIML is still useful. We propose the InsDif and SubCod algorithms. InsDif works by transforming single-instances into the MIML representation for learning, while SubCod works by transforming single-label examples into the MIML representation for learning. Experiments show that in some tasks they are able to achieve better performance than learning the single-instances or single-label examples directly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Mining with rarity: a unifying framework
Weiss, G. M. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007734 · Cited by 1,393
Cited by
Review of Deep Learning Algorithms and Architectures
Shrestha, A., & Mahmood, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2912200 · Cited by 1,883
Multiple instance learning: A survey of problem characteristics and applications
Carbonneau, M.-A., Cheplygina, V., Granger, E., & Gagnon, G. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.009 · Cited by 740
“This idea has been the object of several publications [37, 38, 39].”
BackgroundDistributed selection of continuous features in multilabel classification using mutual information
Gonzalez-Lopez, J., Ventura, S., & Cano, A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2944298 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Z.-H., Zhang, M.-L., Huang, S.-J., & Li, Y.-F.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2291-2320
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027266161
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-instance multi-label learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.artint.2011.10.002
- The paper
- Zhou, Z.-H., Zhang, M.-L., Huang, S.-J., & Li, Y.-F. (2012). Multi-instance multi-label learning. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2011.10.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.