Cited by 740Machine Learning and AlgorithmsMachine Learning and Data ClassificationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Multiple instance learning: A survey of problem characteristics and applications

Open access
Carbonneau, Marc-André, Cheplygina, Veronika, Granger, Eric, Gagnon, Ghyslain·2018·Pattern Recognition

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.009

Cites

221 of 221 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With over 30 billion sequences in total, this represents one of the largest multiple instance learning experiments ever conducted.

    “With over 30 billion sequences in total, this represents one of the largest multiple instance learning experiments ever conducted (Carbonneau et al., 2018).”

    From Hopfield Networks is All You Need (2020) · cites this paper as Carbonneau et al., 2018

    The Introduction (p. 1) discusses growing data volumes in multiple instance learning, and §6.2 (p. 19) describes a dataset with more than 10 million instances. Neither passage establishes that an experiment involving over 30 billion sequences is among the largest ever conducted. Searches for “30 billion,” “sequences,” and experiment size found no passage supporting that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 223 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [5][5] R. Rahmani and S. A. Goldman, 'MISSL: Multiple-instance Semi-supervised Learning,' in ICML , 2006. -
  2. [6][6] S. Andrews, I. Tsochantaridis, and T. Hofmann, 'Support Vector Machines for MultipleInstance Learning,' in NIPS , 2002. -
  3. [46][46] F. Herrera, S. Ventura, R. Bello, C. Cornelis, A. Zafra, D. S´ anchez-Tarrag´ o, and S. Vluymans, Multiple Instance Learning: Foundation and Algorithms . Springer, 2016. -
  4. [51][51] H. Wang, M. M. Ullah, A. Klaser, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid, 'Evaluation of Local SpatioTemporal Features for Action Recognition,' in BMVC , 2009. -
  5. [115][115] B. Babenko, M.-H. Yang, and S. Belongie, 'Robust Object Tracking with Online Multiple Instance Learning,' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1619-1632, Aug. 2011. -
  6. [126][126] D. Zhang, J. He, and R. Lawrence, 'Mi2ls: Multi-instance learning from multiple informationsources,' in KDD , 2013. -
  7. [147][147] P. Baldi, K. Cranmer, T. Faucett, P. Sadowski, and D. Whiteson, 'Parameterized machine learning for high-energy physics,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.07913 , 2016. - · arXiv
  8. [151][151] F. Li and C. Sminchisescu, 'Convex Multiple-Instance Learning by Estimating Likelihood Ratio,' NIPS , 2010. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carbonneau, M.-A., Cheplygina, V., Granger, E., & Gagnon, G.
Affiliations
  • École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Carbonneau, Marc-André
Venue
Pattern Recognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
77
Pages
329-353
ISSN
0031-3203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560886373
Cited by
740
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
22.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Espace ÉTS (ETS) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
multiple instance learning, weakly supervised learning, problem characteristics, data distribution, label ambiguity, computer vision, document classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review