The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains
Open accessAbstract
DNA microarray experiments generating thousands of gene expression measurements, are used to collect information from tissue and cell samples regarding gene expression differences that could be useful for diagnosis disease, distinction of the specific tumor type, etc. One important application of gene expression microarray data is the classification of samples into known categories. As DNA microarray technology measures the gene expression en masse, this has resulted in data with the number of features (genes) far exceeding the number of samples. As the predictive accuracy of supervised classifiers that try to discriminate between the classes of the problem decays with the existence of irrelevant and redundant features, the necessity of a dimensionality reduction process is essential. We propose the application of a gene selection process, which also enables the biology researcher to focus on promising gene candidates that actively contribute to classification in these large scale microarrays. Two basic approaches for feature selection appear in machine learning and pattern recognition literature: the filter and wrapper techniques. Filter procedures are used in most of the works in the area of DNA microarrays. In this work, a comparison between a group of different filter metrics and a wrapper sequential search procedure is carried out. The comparison is performed in two well-known DNA microarray datasets by the use of four classic supervised classifiers. The study is carried out over the original-continuous and three-intervals discretized gene expression data. While two well-known filter metrics are proposed for continuous data, four classic filter measures are used over discretized data. The same wrapper approach is used for both continuous and discretized data. The application of filter and wrapper gene selection procedures leads to considerably better accuracy results in comparison to the non-gene selection approach, coupled with interesting and notable dimensionality reductions. Although the wrapper approach mainly shows a more accurate behavior than filter metrics, this improvement is coupled with considerable computer-load necessities. We note that most of the genes selected by proposed filter and wrapper procedures in discrete and continuous microarray data appear in the lists of relevant-informative genes detected by previous studies over these datasets. The aim of this work is to make contributions in the field of the gene selection task in DNA microarray datasets. By an extensive comparison with more popular filter techniques, we would like to make contributions in the expansion and study of the wrapper approach in this type of domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · Cited by 23,431
Golub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek, M., Mesirov, J. P., Coller, H., Loh, M. L., Downing, J. R., Caligiuri, M. A., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.531 · Cited by 11,516
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
Wrappers for feature subset selection
Kohavi, R., & John, G. H. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00043-x · Cited by 8,947
Alon, U., Barkai, N., Notterman, D. A., Gish, K., Ybarra, S., Mack, D., & Levine, A. J. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.12.6745 · Cited by 4,167
Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms
Dietterich, T. G. (1998) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976698300017197 · Cited by 3,840
Using Bayesian Networks to Analyze Expression Data
Friedman, N., Linial, M., Nachman, I., & Pe'er, D. (2000) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/106652700750050961 · Cited by 3,266
Comparison of Discrimination Methods for the Classification of Tumors Using Gene Expression Data
Dudoit, S., Fridlyand, J., & Speed, T. P. (2002) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214502753479248 · Cited by 2,672
Khan, J., Wei, J. S., Ringnér, M., Saal, L. H., Ladanyi, M., Westermann, F., Berthold, F., Schwab, M., Antonescu, C. R., Peterson, C., et al. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/89044 · Cited by 2,644
Furey, T. S., Cristianini, N., Duffy, N., Bednarski, D. W., Schummer, M., & Haussler, D. (2000) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.906 · Cited by 2,443
Cited by
Machine learning in bioinformatics
Larrañaga, P., Calvo, B., Santana, R., Bielza, C., Galdiano, J., Inza, I., Lozano, J. A., Armañanzas, R., Santafé, G., Pérez, A., et al. (2006) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbk007 · Cited by 867
Self-citationFeature selection for classification: A review
Tang, J., Alelyani, S., & Liu, H. (2014) · doi:10.1201/b17320-7 · Cited by 757
A review of microarray datasets and applied feature selection methods
Bolón-Canedo, V., Sánchez-Maroño, N., Alonso-Betanzos, A., Benítez, J. M., & Herrera, F. (2014) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.05.042 · Cited by 666
Jain, I., Jain, V. K., & Jain, R. (2018) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.09.038 · Cited by 423
Recent advances in feature selection and its applications
Li, Y., Li, T., & Liu, H. (2017) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-017-1059-8 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- Inza, I., Larrañaga, P., Blanco, R., & Cerrolaza, A. J.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-103
- ISSN
- 0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127824649
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.artmed.2004.01.007
- The paper
- Inza, I., Larrañaga, P., Blanco, R., & Cerrolaza, A. J. (2004). Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2004.01.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.