Recognition of dietary activity events using on-body sensors
Abstract
Objective An imbalanced diet elevates health risks for many chronic diseases including obesity. Dietary monitoring could contribute vital information to lifestyle coaching and diet management, however, current monitoring solutions are not feasible for a long-term implementation. Towards automatic dietary monitoring, this work targets the continuous recognition of dietary activities using on-body sensors.Methods An on-body sensing approach was chosen, based on three core activities during intake: arm movements, chewing and swallowing. In three independent evaluation studies the continuous recognition of activity events was investigated and the precision-recall performance analysed. An event recognition procedure was deployed, that addresses multiple challenges of continuous activity recognition, including the dynamic adaptability for variable-length activities and flexible deployment by supporting one to many independent classes. The approach uses a sensitive activity event search followed by a selective refinement of the detection using different information fusion schemes. The method is simple and modular in design and implementation.Results The recognition procedure was successfully adapted to the investigated dietary activities. Four intake gesture categories from arm movements and two food groups from chewing cycle sounds were detected and identified with a recall of 80-90% and a precision of 50- 64%. The detection of individual swallows resulted in 68% recall and 20% precision. Sample-accurate recognition rates were 79% for movements, 86% for chewing and 70% for swallowing.Conclusions Body movements and chewing sounds can be accurately identified using on-body sensors, demonstrating the feasibility of on-body dietary monitoring. Further investigations are needed to improve the swallowing spotting performance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wearable technology has been used to monitor physical activities in obese individuals and to facilitate clinical interventions based on encouraging an active and healthy lifestyle.
“For example, wearable technology has been used to monitor physical activities in obese individuals and to facilitate the implementation of clinical interventions based on encouraging an active and healthy lifestyle [53-56].”
From A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation (2012) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 220
- Authors
- Amft, O., & Tröster, G.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Amft, Oliver
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-136
- ISSN
- 0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050282683
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 21.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Keywords
- on-body sensors, dietary monitoring, chewing detection, swallowing detection, data fusion, obesity prevention, dietary management
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Mastication, Motor Activity, Diet Records, Monitoring, Ambulatory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review