Cited by 38

Resolution-based distillation for efficient histology image classification

DiPalma, Joseph, Suriawinata, Arief A., Tafe, Laura J., Torresani, Lorenzo, Hassanpour, Saeed·2021·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102136

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies addressed a five-category classification task-distinguishing lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, and solid growth patterns-and showed that AI can support accurate subtype identification and deeper characterization of tumor morphology.

    “These studies addressed a complex five-category classification task—distinguishing lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, and solid growth patterns—and showed that AI can support both accurate subtype identification and a deeper characterization of tumor morphology.”

    From Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Thoracic Surgery: Clinical Decision Support and Emerging Applications (2026) · cites this paper as [56]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several investigations show that deep learning techniques can assist in detailed histologic classification.

    “Several investigations underline how deep learning techniques can assist in detailed histologic classification [55,56].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. [1]Girolami I, Parwani A, Barresi V, Marletta S, Ammendola S, Stefanizzi L, The landscape of digital pathology in transplantation: From the beginning to the virtual E-slide. J Pathol Inform 2019; 10. 10.4103/jpi.jpi_27_19. PMC6639852 31367473 · DOI
  2. [2]Pantanowitz L, Sharma A, Carter A, Kurc T, Sussman A, Saltz J. Twenty years of digital pathology: An overview of the road travelled, what is on the horizon, and the emergence of vendor-neutral archives. J Pathol Inform 2018; 9. 10.4103/jpi.jpi_69_18. PMC6289005 30607307 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Wei JW, Wei JW, Jackson CR, Ren B, Suriawinata AA, Hassanpour S. Automated detection of celiac disease on duodenal biopsy slides: A deep learning approach. J Pathol Inform 2019; 10. 10.4103/jpi.jpi_87_18. PMC6437784 30984467 · DOI
  4. [6]Zhu M, Ren B, Richards R, Suriawinata M, Tomita N, Hassanpour S. Development and evaluation of a deep neural network for histologic classification of renal cell carcinoma on biopsy and surgical resection slides. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 7080. 10.1038/s41598-021-86540-4. 33782535 PMC8007643 · DOI
  5. [7]Wang S, Yang DM, Rong R, Zhan X, Fujimoto J, Liu H, Artificial intelligence in lung cancer pathology image analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11. 10.3390/cancers11111673. PMC6895901 31661863 · DOI
  6. [8]Wei JW, Tafe LJ, Linnik YA, Vaickus LJ, Tomita N, Hassanpour S. Pathologist-level classification of histologic patterns on resected lung adenocarcinoma slides with deep neural networks. Sci Rep 2019; 9. 10.1038/s41598-019-40041-7. PMC6399447 30833650 · DOI
  7. [9]Swiderska-Chadaj Z, Nurzynska K, Grala B, Grünberg K, van der Woude L, Looijen-Salamon M, A deep learning approach to assess the predominant tumor growth pattern in whole-slide images of lung adenocarcinoma. In: Tomaszewski JE, Ward AD, editors. Med. Imaging 2020 Digit. Pathol, vol. 11320, SPIE; 2020, p. 12. 10.1117/12.2549742. · DOI
  8. [10]Khurram SA, Graham S, Shaban M, Qaiser T, Rajpoot NM. Classification of lung cancer histology images using patch-level summary statistics. In: Gurcan MN, Tomaszewski JE, editors. Med. Imaging 2018 Digit. Pathol, vol. 10581, SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng; 2018, p. 44. 10.1117/12.2293855. · DOI
  9. [11]Ilse M, Tomczak J, Welling M. Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning. In: Dy J, Krause A, editors. Proc. 35th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., vol. 80, Stockholmsmässan, Stockholm Sweden: PMLR; 2018, p. 2127– 36.
  10. [12]Lerousseau M, Vakalopoulou M, Classe M, Adam J, Battistella E, Carré A, Weakly supervised multiple instance learning histopathological tumor segmentation. In: Martel Anne L, and Abolmaesumi P, Danail and Diana S and M A. and Kevin ZM and ZS, et al., editors. arXiv, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020, p. 470– 9.
  11. [13]Mercan C, Aksoy S, Mercan E, Shapiro LG, Weaver DL, Elmore JG. Multi-Instance Multi-Label Learning for Multi-Class Classification of Whole Slide Breast Histopathology Images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2018; 37. 10.1109/TMI.2017.2758580. PMC5774338 28981408 · DOI
  12. [14]Patil A, Tamboli D, Meena S, Anand D, Sethi A. Breast Cancer Histopathology Image Classification and Localization using Multiple Instance Learning. 2019 IEEE Int. WIE Conf. Electr. Comput. Eng., IEEE; 2019. 10.1109/WIECON-ECE48653.2019.9019916. · DOI
  13. [15]Zhao Y, Yang F, Fang Y, Liu H, Zhou N, Zhang J, Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis Using Histopathological Images Based on Multiple Instance Learning With Deep Graph Convolution. Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit, 2020.
  14. [16]Campanella G, Hanna MG, Geneslaw L, Miraflor A, Werneck Krauss Silva V, Busam KJ, Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nat Med 2019; 25: 1301– 9. 10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1. 31308507 PMC7418463 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [17]Pinckaers H, Litjens GJS. Training convolutional neural networks with megapixel images. ArXiv 2018;abs/1804.0. 32845835
  16. [18]Pinckaers H, Bulten W, van der Laak J, Litjens G. Detection of prostate cancer in whole-slide images through end-to-end training with image-level labels 2020. 33729928
  17. [19]Tomita N, Abdollahi B, Wei J, Ren B, Suriawinata A, Hassanpour S. Attention-Based Deep Neural Networks for Detection of Cancerous and Precancerous Esophagus Tissue on Histopathological Slides. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14645. PMC6865275 31693124 · DOI
  18. [20]Katharopoulos A, Fleuret F. Processing Megapixel Images with Deep Attention-Sampling Models. Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn, 2019.
  19. [21]BenTaieb A, Hamarneh G. Predicting cancer with a recurrent visual attention model for histopathology images. In: Frangi Alejandro F, and Schnabel JA, Christos, Davatzikos A, Carlos, Alberola-López,, editors. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 11071 LNCS, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018, p. 129– 37. 10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_15. · DOI
  20. [23]Deshpande A, Rock J, Forsyth D. Learning Large-Scale Automatic Image Colorization. 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis, 2015, p. 567– 75. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.72. · DOI
  21. [25]Gidaris S, Singh P, Komodakis N. Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotations. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent, 2018.
  22. [26]Noroozi Mehdiand Favaro P. Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzles. In: Leibe Bastianand Matas J and SN and WM, editor. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016, p. 69– 84.
  23. [27]Noroozi M, Pirsiavash H, Favaro P. Representation Learning by Learning to Count. 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., IEEE; 2017. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.628. · DOI
  24. [28]Graham S, Epstein D, Rajpoot N. Dense Steerable Filter CNNs for Exploiting Rotational Symmetry in Histology Images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2020; 39: 4124– 36. 10.1109/TMI.2020.3013246. 32746153 · DOI
  25. [29]Veeling Bastiaan S.and Linmans J and WJ and CT and WM. Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathology. In: Frangi Alejandro F.and Schnabel JA and DC and A-LCand FG, editor. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. –MICCAI 2018, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018, p. 210– 8.
  26. [30]Koohbanani NA, Unnikrishnan B, Khurram SA, Krishnaswamy P, Rajpoot N. Self-Path: Self-supervision for Classification of Pathology Images with Limited Annotations. ArXiv 2020;abs/2008.0. 33523807
  27. [31]Sahasrabudhe M, Christodoulidis S, Salgado R, Michiels S, Loi S, André F, Self-supervised Nuclei Segmentation in Histopathological Images Using Attention. In: Martel AL, Abolmaesumi P, Stoyanov D, Mateus D, Zuluaga MA, Zhou SK, et al., editors. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. - MICCAI 2020 – 23rd Int. Conf. Lima, Peru, Oct. 4–8, 2020, Proceedings, Part V, vol. 12265, Springer; 2020, p. 393– 402. 10.1007/978-3-030-59722-1_38. · DOI
  28. [32]Gildenblat J, Klaiman E. Self-Supervised Similarity Learning for Digital Pathology. ArXiv 2019;abs/1905.0.
  29. [33]Hinton G, Vinyals O, Dean J. Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network. NIPS Deep Learn. Represent. Learn. Work, 2015.
  30. [34]Jimmy Ba L, Caruana R. Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep? vol. 27. 2014.
  31. [35]Buciluǎ C, Caruana R, Niculescu-Mizil A. Model compression. Proc. 12th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. data Min. - KDD ‘06, vol. 2006, New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 2006, p. 535. 10.1145/1150402.1150464. · DOI · Paper page
  32. [36]He T, Shen C, Tian Z, Gong D, Sun C, Yan Y. Knowledge Adaptation for Efficient Semantic Segmentation. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., IEEE; 2019. 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00067. · DOI
  33. [37]Ge S, Zhao S, Li C, Li J. Low-Resolution Face Recognition in the Wild via Selective Knowledge Distillation. IEEE Trans Image Process 2019; 28. 10.1109/TIP.2018.2883743. 30507531 · DOI
  34. [38]Wang M, Liu R, Hajime N, Narishige A, Uchida H, Matsunami T. Improved Knowledge Distillation for Training Fast Low Resolution Face Recognition Model. 2019 IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Work., IEEE; 2019. 10.1109/ICCVW.2019.00324. · DOI
  35. [39]Chen G, Choi W, Yu X, Han T, Chandraker M. Learning Efficient Object Detection Models with Knowledge Distillation. In: Guyon I, Luxburg U V, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S,, editors. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, Curran Associates, Inc.; 2017, p. 742– 51.
  36. [40]Chen Wei-Chunand Chang C-C and LC-R. Knowledge Distillation with Feature Maps for Image Classification. In: Jawahar CVand Li H and MG and SK, editor. Comput. Vis. –ACCV 2018, Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019, p. 200– 15.
  37. [41]Ho TKK, Gwak J. Utilizing Knowledge Distillation in Deep Learning for Classification of Chest X-Ray Abnormalities. IEEE Access 2020; 8. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020802. · DOI
  38. [42]Romero A, Ballas N, Kahou SE, Chassang A, Gatta C, Bengio Y. FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Nets. In: Bengio Y, LeCun Y, editors. 3rd Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7–9, 2015, Conf. Track Proc., 2015.
  39. [43]Su J-C, Maji S. Cross Quality Distillation. CoRR 2016;abs/1604.0.
  40. [45]Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library. In: Wallach H, Larochelle H, Beygelzimer A, d Alché-Buc F, Fox E, Garnett R, editors. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst, vol. 32, Curran Associates, Inc.; 2019, p. 8026– 37.
  41. [46]Kullback S, Leibler RA. On Information and Sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 1951; 22. 10.1214/aoms/1177729694. · DOI · Paper page
  42. [47]Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In: Bengio Y, LeCun Y, editors. 3rd Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7–9, 2015, Conf. Track Proc., 2015.
  43. [48]Wu Y, He K. Group Normalization. Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis, 2018.
  44. [50]Turkowski K. Filters for Common Resampling Tasks. In: GLASSNER AS, editor. Graph. Gems, San Diego: Morgan Kaufmann; 1990, p. 147– 65. 10.1016/B978-0-08-050753-8.50042-5. · DOI
  45. [51]Parzanese I, Qehajaj D, Patrinicola F, Aralica M, Chiriva-Internati M, Stifter S, Celiac disease: From pathophysiology to treatment. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2017; 8. 10.4291/wjgp.v8.i2.27. PMC5437500 28573065 · DOI
  46. [52]Green PHR, Cellier C. Medical progress: Celiac disease. New Engl J Med [NEJM] 2007; 357: 1731– 43. 10.1056/NEJMra071600. 17960014 · DOI
  47. [53]Green PHR, Rostami K, Marsh MN. Diagnosis of coeliac disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 19. 10.1016/j.bpg.2005.02.006. 15925844 · DOI
  48. [54]Chen P, Yang L. tissueloc: Whole slide digital pathology image tissue localization. J Open Source Softw 2019; 4. 10.21105/joss.01148. PMC9534184 36204448 · DOI
  49. [55]Torre LA, Siegel RL, Jemal A. Lung cancer statistics. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016; 893: 1– 19. 10.1007/978-3-319-24223-1_1. 26667336 · DOI
  50. [56]Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson AG, Geisinger KR, Yatabe Y, International association for the study of lung cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6: 244– 85. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206a221. 21252716 PMC4513953 · DOI
  51. [57]Meza R, Meernik C, Jeon J, Cote ML. Lung cancer incidence trends by gender, race and histology in the United States, 1973–2010. PLoS One 2015; 10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0121323. PMC4379166 25822850 · DOI
  52. [58]Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JHM, Beasley MB, The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances since the 2004 Classification. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10: 1243– 60. 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630. 26291008 · DOI
  53. [59]Girard N, Deshpande C, Lau C, Finley D, Rusch V, Pao W, Comprehensive histologic assessment helps to differentiate multiple lung primary nonsmall cell carcinomas from metastases. Am J Surg Pathol 2009; 33: 1752– 64. 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181b8cf03. 19773638 PMC5661977 · DOI
  54. [61]Gutiérrez Olivares VM, González Torres LM, Hunter Cuartas G, Niebles De la Hoz MC. Immunohistochemical profile of renal cell tumours. Rev Esp Patol 2019; 52: 214– 21. 10.1016/j.patol.2019.02.004. 31530404 · DOI
  55. [62]Hsieh JJ, Purdue MP, Signoretti S, Swanton C, Albiges L, Schmidinger M, Renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Prim 2017; 3: 1– 19. 10.1038/nrdp.2017.9. PMC5936048 28276433 · DOI
  56. [63]Ricketts CJ, De Cubas AA, Fan H, Smith CC, Lang M, Reznik E, The Cancer Genome Atlas Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cell Rep 2018; 23: 313– 326.e5. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.075. 29617669 PMC6075733 · DOI
  57. [64]Muglia VF, Prando A. Carcinoma de células renais: Classificação histológica e correlação com métodos de imagem. Radiol Bras 2015; 48: 166– 74. 10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1927. 26185343 PMC4492569 · DOI
  58. [65]DeCastro GJ, McKiernan JM. Epidemiology, Clinical Staging, and Presentation of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 2008; 35: 581– 92. 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.07.005. 18992612 · DOI
  59. [66]He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification. 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., IEEE; 2015 10.1109/ICCV.2015.123. · DOI · Paper page
  60. [67]Chattopadhay A, Sarkar A, Howlader P, Balasubramanian VN. Grad-CAM++: Generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks. Proc. - 2018 IEEE Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vision, WACV 2018, vol. 2018- Janua, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2018, p. 839– 47. 10.1109/WACV.2018.00097. · DOI · Paper page
  61. [69]Kagadis GC, Kloukinas C, Moore K, Philbin J, Papadimitroulas P, Alexakos C, Cloud computing in medical imaging. Med Phys 2013; 40: 070901. 10.1118/1.4811272. 23822402 · DOI · Paper page
  62. [70]Griebel L, Prokosch HU, Köpcke F, Toddenroth D, Christoph J, Leb I, A scoping review of cloud computing in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 15. 10.1186/s12911-015-0145-7. PMC4372226 25888747 · DOI
  63. [71]Navale V, Bourne PE. Cloud computing applications for biomedical science: A perspective. PLoS Comput Biol 2018; 14. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006144. PMC6002019 29902176 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiPalma, J., Suriawinata, A. A., Tafe, L. J., Torresani, L., & Hassanpour, S.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
119
Pages
102136
ISSN
0933-3657
Cited by
38
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA249758)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM012837)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review