Cited by 16AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Improving Representation Learning for Histopathologic Images with Cluster Constraints

Open access
Wu, Weiyi, Gao, Chongyang, DiPalma, Joseph, Vosoughi, Soroush, Hassanpour, Saeed·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Recent advances in whole-slide image (WSI) scanners and computational capabilities have significantly propelled the application of artificial intelligence in histopathology slide analysis. While these strides are promising, current supervised learning approaches for WSI analysis come with the challenge of exhaustively labeling high-resolution slides-a process that is both labor-intensive and timeconsuming. In contrast, self-supervised learning (SSL) pretraining strategies are emerging as a viable alternative, given that they don't rely on explicit data annotations. These SSL strategies are quickly bridging the performance disparity with their supervised counterparts. In this context, we introduce an SSL framework. This framework aims for transferable representation learning and semantically meaningful clustering by synergizing invariance loss and clustering loss in WSI analysis. Notably, our approach outperforms common SSL methods in downstream classification and clustering tasks, as evidenced by tests on the Camelyon16 and a pancreatic cancer dataset. The code and additional details are accessible at https://github.com/wwyi1828/CluSiam.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01957

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Carse Jacob, Carey Frank, and McKenna Stephen. Unsupervised representation learning from pathology images with multi-directional contrastive predictive coding. In 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pages 1254-1258. IEEE, 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, W., Gao, C., DiPalma, J., Vosoughi, S., & Hassanpour, S.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-01
Volume
2023
Pages
21347-21357
OpenAlex
W4390874474
Cited by
16
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
FWCI
2.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
whole slide images, histopathology, self-supervised learning, representation learning, clustering loss, transfer learning, Camelyon16, pancreatic cancer, image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review