Cited by 2Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTopic Modeling

Artificial intelligence language models for medical text analysis: A systematic review

Sorayaie Azar, Amir, Bagherzadeh Mohasefi, Jamshid, Wiil, Uffe Kock, Naemi, Amin, Ebrahimi, Ali·2026·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Medical text records serve as essential repositories of patient information, providing a foundation for informed clinical decision-making, accurate diagnosis, reliable prognosis, and effective treatment planning. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML), have positioned AI-driven language models as powerful tools for analyzing, classifying, and generating medical textual data. In this systematic literature review, an initial search retrieved 548 records published between 1 January 2000 and 1 July 2024. After rigorous screening based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 22 original research articles were included. The review highlights substantial progress in applying advanced architectures such as Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT) to medical text processing tasks. These models consistently outperform conventional NLP and ML approaches, achieving superior results in disease classification, automated clinical documentation, and predictive analytics. However, critical challenges persist, including the limited availability of clinically validated datasets, variability in data preprocessing protocols, insufficient external validation, and the lack of interpretable AI frameworks, all of which collectively hinder clinical trust and large-scale adoption. Future research should prioritize the development of hybrid AI systems that integrate multimodal data sources (text, imaging, and structured records), incorporate explainable AI mechanisms, and adhere to standardized reporting frameworks. Addressing these methodological gaps will be pivotal in enhancing the reliability, clinical applicability, and impact of AI language models, thereby advancing evidence-based medicine, personalized treatment strategies, and overall patient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artmed.2026.103441

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing reviews establish the technical feasibility and performance of healthcare LLMs, but mostly overlook the transparency and interpretability mechanisms required for regulatory approval, clinician acceptance, and patient safety.

    “While existing reviews establish the technical feasibility and performance of healthcare LLMs [50], they mostly overlook the transparency and interpretability mechanisms required for regulatory approval, clinician acceptance, and patient safety.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sorayaie Azar, A., Bagherzadeh Mohasefi, J., Wiil, U. K., Naemi, A., & Ebrahimi, A.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-08
Volume
178
Pages
103441
ISSN
0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7157074496
Cited by
2
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
clinical text mining, clinical natural language processing, BERT, GPT, disease classification, explainable AI, multimodal AI, clinical data quality, clinical trust in AI
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Large Language Models, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Data Mining, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review