A comparative study of classifier ensembles for bankruptcy prediction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some machine learning algorithms are better for classification than regression, while others are better for regression than classification.
“However, some are better for classification than regression, while others are vice versa [47,48].”
From A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
Most machine learning algorithms can be used for both classification and regression tasks.
“literature shows that most machine learning algorithms can be used for classification and regression tasks.”
From A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction (2020) · cites this paper as [48]
Cites
The Strength of Weak Learnability
Schapire, R. E. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116037 · Cited by 4,600 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A comprehensive evaluation of ensemble learning for stock-market prediction
Nti, I. K., Adekoya, A. F., & Weyori, B. A. (2020) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00299-5 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tsai, C.-F., Hsu, Y.-F., & Yen, D. C.
- Affiliations
- National Central University (TW)
- National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
- SUNY Oneonta (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yen, David C.
- Venue
- Applied Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 977-984
- ISSN
- 1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046792933
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 56.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- bankruptcy prediction, ensemble classifiers, boosting, bagging, decision tree ensembles, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, ensemble size, financial distress prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review