The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semi-supervised learning based distributed attack detection framework for IoT
Abstract
Abstract Alongside the development of Internet of Things (IoT), security attacks are also increasing day by day. A number of centralized attack detection mechanisms have been proposed to detect attacks in IoT, wherein an attack detection system is deployed at the central point in the network that collects data from the network and classifies it as “attack” or “normal” using a supervised machine learning algorithm. Note, however, that these mechanisms have failed to achieve significant results due to the distinct requirements of IoT devices, such as scalability, distribution, resource limitations, and low latency. Moreover, the application of supervised machine learning for classification needs a significant amount of labeled data. In this paper, we introduce a fog-based attack detection framework that relies on the fog computing paradigm and a newly proposed ELM-based Semi-supervised Fuzzy C-Means (ESFCM) method. As an extension of cloud computing, fog computing enables attack detection at the network edge and supports distributed attack detection. The ESFCM method uses a semi-supervised fuzzy c-means algorithm to handle the labeled data issue and an Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) algorithm to provide good generalization performance at a faster detection rate. The evaluation was performed on the NSL-KDD dataset, demonstrating that the proposed framework achieved better performance than the centralized attack detection framework. More specifically, it recorded a lower detection time of 11 milliseconds and an accuracy rate of 86.53%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Rahmani, A. M., Gia, T. N., Negash, B., Anzanpour, A., Azimi, I., Jiang, M., & Liljeberg, P. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.02.014 · Cited by 1,198
Distblocknet: a distributed blockchains-based secure SDN architecture for IoT networks
Sharma, P. K., Singh, S., Jeong, Y.-S., & Park, J. H. (2017) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1700041 · Cited by 428
Cited by
A Survey of Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Internet of Things (IoT) Security
Al-Garadi, M. A., Mohamed, A., Al-Ali, A. K., Du, X., Ali, I., & Guizani, M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2988293 · Cited by 1,392
Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Security Based on Learning Techniques
Chaabouni, N., Mosbah, M., Zemmari, A., Sauvignac, C., & Faruki, P. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2896380 · Cited by 940
A review on extreme learning machine
Wang, J., Lu, S., Wang, S.-H., & Zhang, Y.-D. (2022) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-021-11007-7 · Cited by 572
Khraisat, A., & Alazab, A. (2021) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-021-00077-7 · Cited by 508
Internet of Things Intrusion Detection: Centralized, On-Device, or Federated Learning?
Rahman, S. A., Tout, H., Talhi, C., & Mourad, A. (2020) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.011.2000286 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Rathore, S., & Park, J. H.
- Venue
- Applied Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 79-89
- ISSN
- 1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2810749629
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semi-supervised learning based distributed attack detection framework for IoT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.05.049
- The paper
- Rathore, S., & Park, J. H. (2018). Semi-supervised learning based distributed attack detection framework for IoT. Applied Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.05.049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.