The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Security Based on Learning Techniques
Abstract
Pervasive growth of Internet of Things (IoT) is visible across the globe. The 2016 Dyn cyberattack exposed the critical fault-lines among smart networks. Security of IoT has become a critical concern. The danger exposed by infested Internet-connected Things not only affects the security of IoT but also threatens the complete Internet eco-system which can possibly exploit the vulnerable Things (smart devices) deployed as botnets. Mirai malware compromised the video surveillance devices and paralyzed Internet via distributed denial of service attacks. In the recent past, security attack vectors have evolved bothways, in terms of complexity and diversity. Hence, to identify and prevent or detect novel attacks, it is important to analyze techniques in IoT context. This survey classifies the IoT security threats and challenges for IoT networks by evaluating existing defense techniques. Our main focus is on network intrusion detection systems (NIDSs); hence, this paper reviews existing NIDS implementation tools and datasets as well as free and open-source network sniffing software. Then, it surveys, analyzes, and compares state-of-the-art NIDS proposals in the IoT context in terms of architecture, detection methodologies, validation strategies, treated threats, and algorithm deployments. The review deals with both traditional and machine learning (ML) NIDS techniques and discusses future directions. In this survey, our focus is on IoT NIDS deployed via ML since learning algorithms have a good success rate in security and privacy. The survey provides a comprehensive review of NIDSs deploying different aspects of learning techniques for IoT, unlike other top surveys targeting the traditional systems. We believe that, this paper will be useful for academia and industry research, first, to identify IoT threats and challenges, second, to implement their own NIDS and finally to propose new smart techniques in IoT context considering IoT limitations. Moreover, the survey will enable security individuals differentiate IoT NIDS from traditional ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Deng, L., Li, D., Yao, X., & Wang, H. (2018) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-018-1847-2 · Cited by 124
RetractedAl-Turjman, F. M. (2018) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2018.02.012 · Cited by 55
RetractedMastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications
Huang, G.-B., Zhu, Q.-Y., & Siew, C.-K. (2006) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 · Cited by 13,285
Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · Cited by 12,293
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318 · cited 1×
“Profile [94] approach to outline the behavior on HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, SSH and e-mail protocols.”
MethodMoustafa, N., & Slay, J. (2015) · 2015 Military Communications and Information Systems Conference (MilCIS) · doi:10.1109/milcis.2015.7348942 · Cited by 4,033
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332
Snort - Lightweight Intrusion Detection for Networks
Roesch, M. (1999) · Cited by 3,163
Cited by
Security and Privacy for 6G: A Survey on Prospective Technologies and Challenges
Nguyen, V.-L., Lin, P.-C., Cheng, B.-C., Hwang, R.-H., & Lin, Y.-D. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3108618 · Cited by 515
Asharf, J., Moustafa, N., Khurshid, H., Debie, E., Haider, W., & Wahab, A. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9071177 · Cited by 378
Moustafa, N., Koroniotis, N., Keshk, M., Zomaya, A. Y., & Tari, Z. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3280465 · Cited by 266
A survey on privacy and security of Internet of Things
Ogonji, M. M., Okeyo, G., & Wafula, J. M. (2020) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100312 · Cited by 230
Rasool, R. U., Ahmad, H. F., Rafique, W., Qayyum, A., & Qadir, J. (2022) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103332 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaabouni, N., Mosbah, M., Zemmari, A., Sauvignac, C., & Faruki, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2671-2701
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-745X
- OpenAlex
- W2911505293
- Cited by
- 940
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 57.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Security Based on Learning Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2019.2896380
- The paper
- Chaabouni, N., Mosbah, M., Zemmari, A., Sauvignac, C., & Faruki, P. (2019). Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Security Based on Learning Techniques. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2896380
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.