The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Composite Monte Carlo decision making under high uncertainty of novel coronavirus epidemic using hybridized deep learning and fuzzy rule induction
Open accessAbstract
In the advent of the novel coronavirus epidemic since December 2019, governments and authorities have been struggling to make critical decisions under high uncertainty at their best efforts. In computer science, this represents a typical problem of machine learning over incomplete or limited data in early epidemic Composite Monte-Carlo (CMC) simulation is a forecasting method which extrapolates available data which are broken down from multiple correlated/casual micro-data sources into many possible future outcomes by drawing random samples from some probability distributions. For instance, the overall trend and propagation of the infested cases in China are influenced by the temporal–spatial data of the nearby cities around the Wuhan city (where the virus is originated from), in terms of the population density, travel mobility, medical resources such as hospital beds and the timeliness of quarantine control in each city etc. Hence a CMC is reliable only up to the closeness of the underlying statistical distribution of a CMC, that is supposed to represent the behaviour of the future events, and the correctness of the composite data relationships. In this paper, a case study of using CMC that is enhanced by deep learning network and fuzzy rule induction for gaining better stochastic insights about the epidemic development is experimented. Instead of applying simplistic and uniform assumptions for a MC which is a common practice, a deep learning-based CMC is used in conjunction of fuzzy rule induction techniques. As a result, decision makers are benefited from a better fitted MC outputs complemented by min–max rules that foretell about the extreme ranges of future possibilities with respect to the epidemic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitzgerald, K., Pelletier, L., & Reznek, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2017/6536523 · Cited by 35 · cited 1×
“[7] in 2017 for simulating queuing behaviour of an emergency department.”
Cited by
Deep transfer learning-based automated detection of COVID-19 from lung CT scan slices
Ahuja, S., Panigrahi, B. K., Dey, N., Rajinikanth, V., & Gandhi, T. K. (2021) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01826-w · Cited by 380
Self-citationBlockchain and AI-Based Solutions to Combat Coronavirus (COVID-19)-Like Epidemics: A Survey
Nguyen, D. C., Ding, M., Pathirana, P. N., & Seneviratne, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3093633 · Cited by 286
A survey on deep transfer learning to edge computing for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic
Sufian, A., Ghosh, A., Sadiq, A. S., & Smarandache, F. (2020) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2020.101830 · Cited by 156
Ashofteh, A., Bravo, J. M., & Ayuso, M. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109422 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Fong, S. J., Li, G., Dey, N., Crespo, R. G., & Herrera-Viedma, E.
- Venue
- Applied Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 93
- Pages
- 106282
- ISSN
- 1568-4946
- OpenAlex
- W3015698531
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composite Monte Carlo decision making under high uncertainty of novel coronavirus epidemic using hybridized deep learning and fuzzy rule induction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106282
- The paper
- Fong, S. J., Li, G., Dey, N., Crespo, R. G., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2020). Composite Monte Carlo decision making under high uncertainty of novel coronavirus epidemic using hybridized deep learning and fuzzy rule induction. Applied Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.