Cited by 21Forecasting Techniques and ApplicationsCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesTime Series Analysis and Forecasting

An ensemble learning strategy for panel time series forecasting of excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Ashofteh, Afshin, Bravo, Jorge M., Ayuso, Mercedes·2022·Applied Soft Computing

Abstract

Quantifying and analyzing excess mortality in crises such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is crucial for policymakers. Traditional measures fail to take into account differences in the level, long-term secular trends, and seasonal patterns in all-cause mortality across countries and regions. This paper develops and empirically investigates the forecasting performance of a novel, flexible and dynamic ensemble learning with a model selection strategy (DELMS) for the seasonal time series forecasting of monthly respiratory disease death data across a pool of 61 heterogeneous countries. The strategy is based on a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) of heterogeneous time series methods involving both the selection of the subset of best forecasters (model confidence set), the identification of the best holdout period for each contributed model, and the determination of optimal weights using out-of-sample predictive accuracy. A model selection strategy is also developed to remove the outlier models and to combine the models with reasonable accuracy in the ensemble. The empirical outcomes of this large set of experiments show that the accuracy of the BMA approach is significantly improved with DELMS when selecting a flexible and dynamic holdout period and removing the outlier models. Additionally, the forecasts of respiratory disease deaths for each country are highly accurate and exhibit a high correlation (94%) with COVID-19 deaths in 2020.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109422

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ensemble methods can provide superior predictive accuracy relative to single learners in several domain-specific areas.

    “Empirical studies show that they can provide superior predictive accuracy relative to single learners in several domain-specific areas (Ashofteh et al. 2022; Ayuso et al. 2021; Bravo 2021; Kim and Baek 2022).”

    From Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting (2023) · cites this paper as Ashofteh et al. 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]A. Ashofteh, Big Data for Credit Risk Analysis: Efficient Machine Learning Models Using PySpark, in: Proceedings of SIMSTAT 2019-10th International Workshop on Simulation and Statistics, 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashofteh, A., Bravo, J. M., & Ayuso, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
  • Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Ashofteh, Afshin
Venue
Applied Soft Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
128
Pages
109422
ISSN
1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289260730
Cited by
21
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2019-105986GB-C21)
  • National Institute of Science and Technology National Institute of Photonics Applied to Cell Biology
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (2020-PANDE-00074)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Keywords
excess mortality, COVID-19 pandemic, ensemble learning, Bayesian model averaging, model confidence set, seasonal time series forecasting, all-cause mortality, model selection strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review