The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles
Abstract
Abstract Self-driving vehicles are of critical importance to a future sustainable transport system, which is expected to become widespread around the world. However a substantial amount of risk is associated with self-driving vehicles which must be considered by decision-makers effectively. Given that automated driving technology and how it will interact with the mobility system are substantially risky, the risks involved in self-driving vehicles need to be addressed appropriately. The identified knowledge gap of the pre-literature review is that an overview of the identification which completely considers all types of risks related to self-driving vehicles does not exist. In response to this knowledge gap, this study aims to prioritize the risks in self-driving vehicles. Risk prioritization is a complicated multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem that requires consideration of multiple feasible alternatives and conflicting tangible and intangible criteria. This study addresses the prioritization of risks involved with self-driving vehicles by proposing new hybrid MCDM methods based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. This study addresses the prioritization of risks involved with self-driving vehicles by proposing new hybrid MCDM methods based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. The result of the proposed model is validated by performing sensitivity analysis. The performance of proposed methodology with Pythagorean fuzzy sets is also compared with those with ordinary fuzzy sets and it is revealed that the proposed method produces reliable and informative outcomes better representing the impreciseness of decision making problems. The findings of this study will provide useful insight to the planners and policymakers for decision making in self-driving vehicles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,844
Atanassov, K. T. (1986) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(86)80034-3 · Cited by 16,465
A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
Saaty, T. L. (1977) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 · Cited by 10,360
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207
Yager, R. R. (2013) · 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS) · doi:10.1109/ifsa-nafips.2013.6608375 · Cited by 2,703
A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words
Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.890332 · Cited by 2,662
Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets
Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2014) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.21676 · Cited by 1,506
Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. F. (2015) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014 · Cited by 1,383
Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. M. (2014) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001 · Cited by 1,177
Cited by
Evaluation and Prediction of Higher Education System Based on AHP-TOPSIS and LSTM Neural Network
Wang, N., Ren, Z., Zhang, Z., & Fu, J. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12104987 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakioglu, G., & Atahan, A. O.
- Venue
- Applied Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 106948
- ISSN
- 1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3109432046
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 22.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106948
- The paper
- Bakioglu, G., & Atahan, A. O. (2021). AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles. Applied Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.