Cited by 2,662Multi-Criteria Decision MakingFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsAdvanced Algebra and Logic

A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words

Martinez, L., Herrera, F.·2000·IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

Abstract

The fuzzy linguistic approach has been applied successfully to many problems. However, there is a limitation of this approach imposed by its information representation model and the computation methods used when fusion processes are performed on linguistic values. This limitation is the loss of information; this loss of information implies a lack of precision in the final results from the fusion of linguistic information. In this paper, we present tools for overcoming this limitation. The linguistic information is expressed by means of 2-tuples, which are composed of a linguistic term and a numeric value assessed in (-0.5, 0.5). This model allows a continuous representation of the linguistic information on its domain, therefore, it can represent any counting of information obtained in a aggregation process. We then develop a computational technique for computing with words without any loss of information. Finally, different classical aggregation operators are extended to deal with the 2-tuple linguistic model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/91.890332

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez, L., & Herrera, F.
Affiliations
Universidad de Granada (ES)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Published
2000
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
746-752
ISSN
1063-6706 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117827905
Cited by
2,662
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 144 · 2023: 194 · 2022: 184 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 198 · 2018: 185 · 2017: 165 · 2016: 123 · 2015: 151 · 2014: 169 · 2013: 121 · 2012: 98
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Algebra and Logic
Keywords
2-tuple linguistic representation model, computing with words, aggregation operators, information loss, linguistic terms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review