Cited by 131Time Series Analysis and ForecastingFault Detection and Control SystemsMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Contrastive learning based self-supervised time-series analysis

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108397

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 131

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Sadowski, 2018, Deep learning in the natural sciences: Applications to physics, Vol. 11100, 269
  2. Hinton, 2006, Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks, Science, 313, 504, 10.1126/science.1127647 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hinton, 2006, A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets, Neural Comput., 18, 1527, 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. van den Oord, N. Kalchbrenner, K. Kavukcuoglu, Pixel recurrent neural networks, in: Proceedings of The 33rd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 48, 2016, pp. 1747–1756.
  5. Chen, 2017, Multisensor feature fusion for bearing fault diagnosis using sparse autoencoder and deep belief network, IEEE Trans. Instrument. Measur., 66, 1693, 10.1109/TIM.2017.2669947 · DOI
  6. R. Thirukovalluru, S. Dixit, R.K. Sevakula, N.K. Verma, A. Salour, Generating feature sets for fault diagnosis using denoising stacked auto-encoder, in: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM), 2016, pp. 1–7. · DOI
  7. T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, G. Hinton, A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, 2020, pp. 1597–1607.
  8. K. He, H. Fan, Y. Wu, S. Xie, R. Girshick, Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning, in: Proceedings of The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 9729–9738. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Henaff, 2020, Data-efficient image recognition with contrastive predictive coding, Vol. 119, 4182
  10. C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, A. Rabinovich, Going deeper with convolutions, in: Proceedings of The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015, pp. 1–9. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Zhang, 2019, A review on deep learning applications in prognostics and health management, IEEE Access, 7, 162415, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950985 · DOI
  12. Lei, 2019, Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on Long Short-term memory networks, Renew. Energy, 133, 422, 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.031 · DOI
  13. Chadha, 2020, Bidirectional deep recurrent neural networks for process fault classification, ISA Trans., 106, 330, 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.07.011 · DOI
  14. Jiang, 2019, Multiscale convolutional neural networks for fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearbox, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 66, 3196, 10.1109/TIE.2018.2844805 · DOI
  15. C. Jing, X. Gao, X. Zhu, S. Lang, Fault classification on Tennessee Eastman process: PCA and SVM, in: 2014 International Conference on Mechatronics and Control (ICMC), 2014, pp. 2194–2197. · DOI
  16. Huang, 2020, Fault classification in dynamic processes using multiclass relevance vector machine and slow feature analysis, IEEE Access, 8, 9115, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962008 · DOI
  17. Yu, 2020, Multichannel one-dimensional convolutional neural network-based feature learning for fault diagnosis of industrial processes, Neural Comput. Appl.
  18. Wang, 2020, Intelligent fault diagnosis for chemical processes using deep learning multimodel fusion, IEEE Trans. Cybernet., 1
  19. Wang, 2020, Deep learning for fault-relevant feature extraction and fault classification with stacked supervised auto-encoder, J. Process Control, 92, 79, 10.1016/j.jprocont.2020.05.015 · DOI
  20. Chai, 2020, Enhanced random forest with concurrent analysis of static and dynamic nodes for industrial fault classification: IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 16(1), 54-66, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 16, 54, 10.1109/TII.2019.2915559 · DOI
  21. Zhang, 2017, A deep belief network based fault diagnosis model for complex chemical processes, Comput. Chem. Eng., 107, 395, 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.02.041 · DOI
  22. Tao, 2016, Bearing fault diagnosis based on deep belief network and multisensor information fusion, Shock Vib., 2016, 1
  23. Sun, 2016, A sparse auto-encoder-based deep neural network approach for induction motor faults classification, Measurement, 89, 171, 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.007 · DOI
  24. Qi, 2017, Stacked sparse autoencoder-based deep network for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery, IEEE Access, 5, 15066, 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2728010 · DOI
  25. Berthelot, 2019, Mixmatch: A holistic approach to semi-supervised learning, Vol. 32
  26. D. Berthelot, N. Carlini, E.D. Cubuk, A. Kurakin, K. Sohn, H. Zhang, C. Raffel, ReMixMatch: Semi-supervised learning with distribution matching and augmentation anchoring, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  27. Sohn, 2020, Fixmatch: Simplifying semi-supervised learning with consistency and confidence, Vol. 33, 596
  28. S. Gidaris, P. Singh, N. Komodakis, Unsupervised representation learning by predicting image rotations, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
  29. Becker, 1992, Self-organizing neural network that discovers surfaces in random-dot stereograms, Nature, 355, 161, 10.1038/355161a0 · DOI
  30. M. Caron, P. Bojanowski, A. Joulin, M. Douze, Deep clustering for unsupervised learning of visual features, in: Proceedings of The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 132–149. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Caron, 2020, Unsupervised learning of visual features by contrasting cluster assignments, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 33
  32. Al-Tahan, 2021, CLAR: Contrastive learning of auditory representations, Vol. 130, 2530
  33. Mohsenvand, 2020, Contrastive representation learning for electroencephalogram classification, Vol. 136, 238
  34. A. Le Guennec, S. Malinowski, R. Tavenard, Data Augmentation for Time Series Classification using Convolutional Neural Networks, in: ECML/PKDD Workshop on Advanced Analytics and Learning on Temporal Data, Riva Del Garda, Italy, 2016.
  35. T.T. Um, F.M.J. Pfister, D. Pichler, S. Endo, M. Lang, S. Hirche, U. Fietzek, D. Kulić, Data augmentation of wearable sensor data for parkinson’s disease monitoring using convolutional neural networks, in: Proceedings of The 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 2017, pp. 216–220. · DOI · Paper page
  36. G. Forestier, F. Petitjean, H.A. Dau, G. Webb, E. Keogh, Generating synthetic time series to augment sparse datasets, in: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 2017, pp. 865–870. · DOI
  37. Wang, 2020, Understanding contrastive representation learning through alignment and uniformity on the hypersphere, Vol. 119, 9929
  38. R. Katarya, S. Rastogi, A study on neural networks approach to time-series analysis, in: 2018 2nd International Conference on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC), 2018, pp. 116–119. · DOI
  39. R. Katarya, A. Lal, A study on combating emerging threat of deepfake weaponization, in: 2020 Fourth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), 2020, pp. 485–490. · DOI
  40. Gupta, 2020, Research on understanding the effect of deep learning on user preferences, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 46
  41. Katarya, 2020, Capsmf: a novel product recommender system using deep learning based text analysis model, Multimedia Tools Appl., 1
  42. G. Gupta, R. Katarya, A study of deep reinforcement learning based recommender systems, in: 2021 2nd International Conference on Secure Cyber Computing and Communications (ICSCCC), 2021, pp. 218–220. · DOI
  43. Downs, 1993, A plant-wide industrial process control problem, Comput. Chem. Eng., 17, 245, 10.1016/0098-1354(93)80018-I · DOI · Paper page
  44. Maas, 2013, Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models, Vol. 30, 3
  45. Pedregosa, 2011, Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python, J. Mach. Learning Res., 12, 2825
  46. Yuan, 2019, A multiscale feature learning scheme based on deep learning for industrial process monitoring and fault diagnosis, IEEE Access, 7, 151189, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947714 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Pöppelbaum, J., Chadha, G. S., & Schwung, A.
Affiliations
South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Pöppelbaum, Johannes
Venue
Applied Soft Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
117
Pages
108397
ISSN
1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206136329
Cited by
131
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 5
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Keywords
contrastive learning, self-supervised learning, time series analysis, SimCLR, data augmentation, fault classification, Tennessee Eastman process, partially labeled data, time series forecasting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contrastive learning based self-supervised time-series analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108397
The paper
Pöppelbaum, J., Chadha, G. S., & Schwung, A. (2022). Contrastive learning based self-supervised time-series analysis. Applied Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108397