Cited by 83Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Financial Distress and Bankruptcy PredictionImbalanced Data Classification Techniques

An Explainable AI framework for credit evaluation and analysis

Open access
Nallakaruppan, M.K., Balusamy, Balamurugan, Shri, M. Lawanya, Malathi, V., Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha·2024·Applied Soft Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111307

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nallakaruppan, M. K., Balusamy, B., Shri, M. L., Malathi, V., & Bhattacharyya, S.
Affiliations
  • Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
  • Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
  • VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ)
Corresponding author
Bhattacharyya, Siddhartha
Venue
Applied Soft Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
153
Pages
111307
ISSN
1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391364314
Cited by
83
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 9
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace VŠB-TUO (VŠB-TUO) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Keywords
explainable AI, creditworthiness assessment, lending, random forest, lime, SHAP, non-fungible tokens, Industry 5.0, credit scoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review