Cited by 6Multi-Criteria Decision MakingGlobal Politics and EconomyGlobal trade and economics

Multidimensional trade performance assessment for integrating sustainability and economic diversification in OECD countries using a spherical fuzzy SIWEC-SPC-based decision support model

Open access
Yalçın, Galip Cihan, Kara, Karahan, Özekenci, Emre Kadir, Simic, Vladimir, Pamucar, Dragan·2025·Applied Soft Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113934

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yalçın, G. C., Kara, K., Özekenci, E. K., Simic, V., & Pamucar, D.
Affiliations
  • Ostim Technical University (TR)
  • Çağ University (TR)
  • Doğuş University (TR)
Venue
Applied Soft Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
185
Pages
113934
ISSN
1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414311619
Cited by
6
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
  • Çağ University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Global Politics and Economy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
Keywords
sustainable development, economic diversification, spherical fuzzy sets, expert opinion, regional trade blocs, OECD countries, decision support model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review