Cited by 21Spaceflight effects on biologyImmunotoxicology and immune responsesCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Comparison of hindlimb unloading and partial weight suspension models for spaceflight-type condition induced effects on white blood cells

Open access
Wilson, Jolaine M, Krigsfeld, Gabriel S., Sanzari, Jenine K., Wagner, Erika B., Mick, Rosemarie, Kennedy, Ann R.·2012·Advances in Space Research

Abstract

Animal models are frequently used to assist in the determination of the long- and short-term effects of space flight. The space environment, including microgravity, can impact many physiological and immunological system parameters. It has been found that ground based models of microgravity produce changes in white blood cell counts, which negatively affects immunologic function. As part of the Center of Acute Radiation Research (CARR), we compared the acute effects on white blood cell parameters induced by the more traditionally used animal model of hindlimb unloading (HU) with a recently developed reduced weightbearing analog known as partial weight suspension (PWS). Female ICR mice were either hindlimb unloaded or placed in the PWS system at 16% quadrupedal weightbearing for 4 h, 1, 2, 7 or 10 days, at which point complete blood counts were obtained. Control animals (jacketed and non-jacketed) were exposed to identical conditions without reduced weightbearing. Results indicate that significant changes in total white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte and eosinophil counts were observed within the first 2 days of exposure to each system. These differences in blood cell counts normalized by day 7 in both systems. The results of these studies indicate that there are some statistically significant changes observed in the blood cell counts for animals exposed to both the PWS and HU simulated microgravity systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asr.2011.09.019

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radiation combined with spaceflight environment stressors (microgravity, environmental constraints, emotional stress) increases susceptibility to infection in animal studies.

    “Results from animal studies examining the synergistic effects of radiation combined with spaceflight environment stressors (i.e., microgravity, environmental constraints, emotional stress) show increased susceptibility to infection, delayed wound healing and decreased survival [73,74,75].”
  • Radiation combined with spaceflight environment stressors decreases survival in animal studies.

    “Results from animal studies examining the synergistic effects of radiation combined with spaceflight environment stressors (i.e., microgravity, environmental constraints, emotional stress) show increased susceptibility to infection, delayed wound healing and decreased survival [73,74,75].”
  • Radiation combined with spaceflight environment stressors delays wound healing in animal studies.

    “Results from animal studies examining the synergistic effects of radiation combined with spaceflight environment stressors (i.e., microgravity, environmental constraints, emotional stress) show increased susceptibility to infection, delayed wound healing and decreased survival [73,74,75].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fox JG Barthold S Davisson M Newcomer CE Quimby FW Smith AL The Mouse in Biomedical Research: Normative Biology, Husbandry, and Models 2007 Burlington, MA Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, J. M., Krigsfeld, G. S., Sanzari, J. K., Wagner, E. B., Mick, R., & Kennedy, A. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Ann R.
Venue
Advances in Space Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
237-248
ISSN
0273-1177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040260821
Cited by
21
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Space Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009677)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
hindlimb unloading, simulated microgravity, white blood cell count, spaceflight immunology, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, ICR mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review