The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Calibrating the nonlinear matter power spectrum: Requirements for future weak lensing surveys
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Uncertainties in predicting the nonlinear clustering of matter are among the most serious theoretical systematics facing the upcoming wide-field weak gravitational lensing surveys. We estimate the accuracy with which the matter power spectrum will need to be calibrated in order not to contribute appreciably to the error budget for future weak lensing surveys. We consider the random statistical errors and the systematic biases in P ( k ), as well as some estimates based on current N-body simulations. While the power spectrum on relevant scales (0.1 ≲ k / h Mpc −1 ≲ 10) is currently calibrated with N-body simulations to about 5–10%, in the future it will have to be calibrated to about 1–2% accuracy, depending on the specifications of the survey. Encouragingly, we find that even the worst-case error that mimics the effect of cosmological parameters needs to be calibrated to no better than about 0.5–1%. These goals require a suite of high resolution N-body simulations on a relatively fine grid in cosmological parameter space, and should be achievable in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
Huterer, D., Takada, M., Bernstein, G., & Jain, B. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09782.x · Cited by 409
Self-citationWeak Lensing for Precision Cosmology
Mandelbaum, R. (2018) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928 · Cited by 409
Growth of cosmic structure: Probing dark energy beyond expansion
Huterer, D., Kirkby, D., Bean, R., Connolly, A., Dawson, K., Dodelson, S., Evrard, A., Jain, B., Jarvis, M., Linder, E., et al. (2015) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.07.004 · Cited by 143
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- HUTERER, D., & TAKADA, M.
- Venue
- Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 369-376
- ISSN
- 0927-6505 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040444105
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calibrating the nonlinear matter power spectrum: Requirements for future weak lensing surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.02.006
- The paper
- HUTERER, D., & TAKADA, M. (2005). Calibrating the nonlinear matter power spectrum: Requirements for future weak lensing surveys. Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.02.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.