Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Calibrating the nonlinear matter power spectrum: Requirements for future weak lensing surveys

Open access
HUTERER, D, TAKADA, M·2005·Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

Abstract Uncertainties in predicting the nonlinear clustering of matter are among the most serious theoretical systematics facing the upcoming wide-field weak gravitational lensing surveys. We estimate the accuracy with which the matter power spectrum will need to be calibrated in order not to contribute appreciably to the error budget for future weak lensing surveys. We consider the random statistical errors and the systematic biases in P ( k ), as well as some estimates based on current N-body simulations. While the power spectrum on relevant scales (0.1 ≲ k / h Mpc −1 ≲ 10) is currently calibrated with N-body simulations to about 5–10%, in the future it will have to be calibrated to about 1–2% accuracy, depending on the specifications of the survey. Encouragingly, we find that even the worst-case error that mimics the effect of cosmological parameters needs to be calibrated to no better than about 0.5–1%. These goals require a suite of high resolution N-body simulations on a relatively fine grid in cosmological parameter space, and should be achievable in the near future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.02.006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
HUTERER, D., & TAKADA, M.
Venue
Astroparticle Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
369-376
ISSN
0927-6505 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040444105
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calibrating the nonlinear matter power spectrum: Requirements for future weak lensing surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.02.006
The paper
HUTERER, D., & TAKADA, M. (2005). Calibrating the nonlinear matter power spectrum: Requirements for future weak lensing surveys. Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.02.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.