CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 899Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite

Open access
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, Luca, Appleby, Stephen, Bacon, David, Baker, Tessa, Baldi, Marco, Bartolo, Nicola, Blanchard, Alain +56 more·2013·Living Reviews in Relativity
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2013-6PMC PMC5660884
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Euclid is a European Space Agency medium-class mission selected for launch in 2019 within the Cosmic Vision 2015 -2025 program.The main goal of Euclid is to understand the origin of the accelerated expansion of the universe.Euclid will explore the expansion history of the universe and the evolution of cosmic structures by measuring shapes and red-shifts of galaxies as well as the distribution of clusters of galaxies over a large fraction of the sky.Although the main driver for Euclid is the nature of dark energy, Euclid science covers a vast range of topics, from cosmology to galaxy evolution to planetary research.In this review we focus on cosmology and fundamental physics, with a strong emphasis on science beyond the current standard models.We discuss five broad topics: dark energy and modified gravity, dark matter, initial conditions, basic assumptions and questions of methodology in the data analysis.This review has been planned and carried out within Euclid's Theory Working Group and is meant to provide a guide to the scientific themes that will underlie the activity of the group during the preparation of the Euclid mission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12942/lrr-2013-6

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modified gravity models have changed field equations leading to changes in Poisson equations with non-vanishing slip parameter; they are characterized by a fifth force and violate the SEP.

    “Modified gravity models: These are models where the Field equations are changed leading to changes in the Poisson equations with non vanishing slip parameter . These are characterized by the presence of fifth force and violate the SEP.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Amendola et al. (2013a)

    In “Models of dark energy and modified gravity” (page unavailable), the paper says modifying gravity can produce a modified Poisson equation and discusses fifth forces associated with extra degrees of freedom. In “Generic properties of dark energy and modified gravity models” (page unavailable), it says nonzero anisotropic stress is generic, not universal. The cited passages do not establish that all modified-gravity models have a fifth force or violate the strong equivalence principle; the paper discusses equivalence-principle violations as possible effects of particular scalar-tensor theories. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The set of PPF parameters covers super-horizon and sub-horizon scales but simplifies significantly in the quasi-static regime, reducing to one of the pairs of parameters discussed in Sect. 5.2.

    “The set of PPF parameters covers super-horizon and sub-horizon scales but the set simplifies significantly in the quasi-static regime reducing to what could be encapsulated in one of the pairs of parameters discussed in Sect. 5.2.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Amendola et al. (2013a)

  • Standard dark energy models have no clustering on sub-horizon scales with sound speed equal to speed of light.

    “Standard dark energy models: the scalar field here is non-minimally coupled to curvature in the Einstein’s equations and has standard kinetic energy. The dark energy has no clustering on sub-horizon with a sound speed equal to the speed of light.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Amendola et al. (2013a)

  • Amendola et al. (2013a) chose to call models with Q=1 dark energy models, and if any departs from unity then it is an MG model.

    “So models with are dark energy models while if any of them departs from unity then it is an MG model.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Amendola et al. (2013a)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 935

  1. [1]Abazajian K Switzer ER Dodelson S Heitmann K Habib S Nonlinear cosmological matter power spectrum with massive neutrinos: The halo model Phys. Rev. D 2005 71 043507 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.043507 · DOI
  2. [2]Abbott LF Sikivie P A cosmological bound on the invisible axion Phys. Lett. B 1983 120 133 136 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90638-X · DOI
  3. [3]Abdalla E Abramo LR Sodré L Jr Wang B Signature of the interaction between dark energy and dark matter in galaxy clusters Phys. Lett. B 2009 673 107 110 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.02.008 · DOI
  4. [4]Abel SA Goodsell MD Jaeckel J Khoze VV Ringwald A Kinetic mixing of the photon with hidden U(1)s in string phenomenology J. High Energy Phys. 2008 2008 07 124 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/124 · DOI
  5. [5]Abel SA Jaeckel J Khoze VV Ringwald A Illuminating the hidden sector of string theory by shining light through a magnetic field Phys. Lett. B 2008 666 66 70 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.03.076 · DOI
  6. [6]Abel SA Schofield BW Brane-antibrane kinetic mixing, millicharged particles and SUSY breaking Nucl. Phys. B 2004 685 150 170 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.02.037 · DOI
  7. [7]Ackerman L Carroll SM Wise MB Imprints of a primordial preferred direction on the microwave background Phys. Rev. D 2007 75 083502 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083502 · DOI
  8. [8]Acquaviva V Verde L Observational signatures of Jordan-Brans-Dicke theories of gravity J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2007 2007 12 001 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/12/001 · DOI
  9. [9]Adamek J Campo D Niemeyer JC Anisotropic Kantowski-Sachs Universe from Gravitational Tunneling and its Observational Signatures Phys. Rev. D 2010 82 086006 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.086006 · DOI
  10. [10]Affleck I Dine M A new mechanism for baryogenesis Nucl. Phys. B 1985 249 361 380 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90021-5 · DOI
  11. [11]Afshordi N Geshnizjani G Khoury J Do observations offer evidence for cosmological-scale extra dimensions? J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2009 2009 08 030 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/08/030 · DOI
  12. [12]Afshordi N Zaldarriaga M Kohri K On the stability of Dark Energy with Mass-Varying Neutrinos Phys. Rev. D 2005 72 065024 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.065024 · DOI
  13. [13]Aguilar-Arevalo AA MiniBooNE Collaboration Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance at the Δm2 ∼ 1eV2 Scale Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007 98 231801 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.231801 17677898 · DOI
  14. [14]Aguirre AN Intergalactic Dust and Observations of Type Ia Supernovae Astrophys. J. 1999 525 583 593 10.1086/307945 · DOI
  15. [15]Agulló I Navarro-Salas J Olmo GJ Parker L Revising the observable consequences of slow-roll inflation Phys. Rev. D 2010 81 043514 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.043514 · DOI
  16. [16]Ahlers M Hubble diagram as a probe of minicharged particles Phys. Rev. D 2009 80 023513 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.023513 · DOI
  17. [17]Ahlers M Gies H Jaeckel J Redondo J Ringwald A Laser experiments explore the hidden sector Phys. Rev. D 2008 77 095001 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.095001 · DOI
  18. [18]Akofor E Balachandran AP Jo SG Joseph A Qureshi BA Direction-dependent CMB power spectrum and statistical anisotropy from noncommutative geometry J. High Energy Phys. 2008 2008 05 092 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/05/092 · DOI
  19. [19]Alabidi L Lyth DH Inflation models and observation J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2006 2006 05 016 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/016 · DOI
  20. [22]Albrecht, A. et al., “Findings of the Joint Dark Energy Mission Figure of Merit Science Working Group”, arXiv, e-print, (2009). [ADS], [arXiv:0901.0721 [astro-ph.IM]]. (Cited on pages 100, 207, and 212.) · arXiv
  21. [23]Alcock C The MACHO Project: Microlensing Results from 5.7 Years of Large Magellanic Cloud Observations Astrophys. J. 2000 542 281 307 10.1086/309512 · DOI
  22. [24]Alexander S Brandenberger RH Magueijo J Noncommutative inflation Phys. Rev. D 2003 67 081301 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.081301 · DOI
  23. [25]Alishahiha M Silverstein E Tong D DBI in the sky: Non-Gaussianity from inflation with a speed limit Phys. Rev. D 2004 70 123505 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123505 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [26]Allen SW Rapetti DA Schmidt RW Ebeling H Morris RG Fabian AC Improved constraints on dark energy from Chandra X-ray observations of the largest relaxed galaxy clusters Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2008 383 879 896 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12610.x · DOI
  25. [27]Alnes H Amarzguioui M CMB anisotropies seen by an off-center observer in a spherically symmetric inhomogeneous universe Phys. Rev. D 2006 74 103520 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.103520 · DOI
  26. [28]Alnes H Amarzguioui M Groen O Inhomogeneous alternative to dark energy? Phys. Rev. D 2006 73 083519 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.083519 · DOI
  27. [29]Alonso D García-Bellido J Haugbølle T Knebe A Halo abundances and shear in void models Phys. Dark Universe 2012 1 24 31 10.1016/j.dark.2012.08.001 · DOI
  28. [30]Alonso D García-Bellido J Haugbølle T Vicente J Large scale structure simulations of in-homogeneous Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi void models Phys. Rev. D 2010 82 123530 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.123530 · DOI
  29. [31]Amara A Kitching TD Figures of Merit for Testing Standard Models: Application to Dark Energy Experiments in Cosmology Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010 413 1505 1514 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17947.x · DOI
  30. [32]Amarzguioui M Elgarøy Ø Mota DF Multamäki T Cosmological constraints on f(R) gravity theories within the Palatini approach Astron. Astrophys. 2006 454 707 714 10.1051/0004-6361:20064994 · DOI
  31. [33]Amendola L Coupled quintessence Phys. Rev. D 2000 62 043511 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043511 · DOI
  32. [34]Amendola L Perturbations in a coupled scalar field cosmology Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2000 312 521 530 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03165.x · DOI
  33. [35]Amendola L Linear and nonlinear perturbations in dark energy models Phys. Rev. D 2004 69 103524 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.103524 · DOI
  34. [36]Amendola L Baldi M Wetterich C Quintessence cosmologies with a growing matter component Phys. Rev. D 2008 78 023015 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.023015 · DOI
  35. [37]Amendola L Barbieri R Dark matter from an ultra-light pseudo-Goldsone-boson Phys. Lett. B 2006 642 192 196 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.08.069 · DOI
  36. [38]Amendola L Finelli F Burigana C Carturan D WMAP and the generalized Chaplygin gas J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2003 2003 07 005 10.1088/1475-7516/2003/07/005 · DOI
  37. [39]Amendola L Gannouji R Polarski D Tsujikawa S Conditions for the cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models Phys. Rev. D 2007 75 083504 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083504 17501182 · DOI
  38. [40]Amendola L Gordon C Wands D Sasaki M Correlated Perturbations from Inflation and the Cosmic Microwave Background Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002 88 211302 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.211302 12059471 · DOI
  39. [42]Amendola L Pettorino V Quercellini C Vollmer A Testing coupled dark energy with next-generation large-scale observations Phys. Rev. D 2011 85 103008 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.103008 · DOI
  40. [43]Amendola L Polarski D Tsujikawa S Are f(R) Dark Energy Models Cosmologically Viable? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007 98 131302 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.131302 17501182 · DOI
  41. [44]Amendola L Quercellini C Tracking and coupled dark energy as seen by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Phys. Rev. D 2003 68 023514 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023514 · DOI
  42. [45]Amendola L Quercellini C Skewness as a Test of the Equivalence Principle Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004 92 181102 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.181102 15169479 · DOI
  43. [46]Amendola L Quercellini C Giallongo E Constraints on perfect fluid and scalar field dark energy models from future redshift surveys Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2005 357 429 439 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08558.x · DOI
  44. [47]Amendola L Quercellini C Tocchini-Valentini D Pasqui A Cosmic Microwave Background as a Gravity Probe Astrophys. J. Lett. 2003 583 L53 L56 10.1086/368064 · DOI
  45. [48]Amendola L Tsujikawa S Phantom crossing, equation-of-state singularities, and local gravity constraints in f(R) models Phys. Lett. B 2008 660 125 132 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.12.041 · DOI
  46. [49]Amendola L Tsujikawa S Dark Energy: Theory and Observations 2010 Cambridge; New York Cambridge University Press
  47. [50]Amendola L Waga I Finelli F Observational constraints on silent quartessence J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2005 2005 11 009 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/11/009 · DOI
  48. [51]Amsler C Particle Data Group Review of Particle Physics Phys. Lett. B 2008 667 1 6 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 · DOI
  49. [52]André, P. et al. (PRISM Collaboration), “PRISM (Polarized Radiation Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission): A White Paper on the Ultimate Polarimetric Spectro-Imaging of the Microwave and Far-Infrared Sky”, arXiv, e-print, (2013). [ADS], [arXiv:1306.2259 [astro-ph.CO]]. (Cited on page 56.) · arXiv
  50. [53]Appleby S Battye R Do consistent F(R) models mimic general relativity plus Λ? Phys. Lett. B 2007 654 7 12 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.08.037 · DOI
  51. [54]Appleby SA Weller J Parameterizing scalar-tensor theories for cosmological probes J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010 2010 12 006 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/12/006 · DOI
  52. [55]Arbey A Dark fluid: A complex scalar field to unify dark energy and dark matter Phys. Rev. D 2006 74 043516 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.043516 · DOI
  53. [56]Arkani-Hamed NA Cheng HS Luty MA Mukohyama S Ghost condensation and a consistent infrared modification of gravity J. High Energy Phys. 2004 2004 05 074 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/05/074 · DOI · Paper page
  54. [57]Arkani-Hamed N Creminelli P Mukohyama S Zaldarriaga M Ghost inflation J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2004 2004 04 001 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/04/001 · DOI · Paper page
  55. [58]Arkani-Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., Dvali, G. and Gabadadze, G., “Non-local modification of gravity and the cosmological constant problem”, arXiv, e-print, (2002). [ADS], [arXiv:hep-th/0209227]. (Cited on pages 43 and 45.) · arXiv
  56. [59]Armendariz-Picon C Could dark energy be vector-like? J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2004 2004 07 007 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/07/007 · DOI
  57. [60]Armendariz-Picon C Damour T Mukhanov VF k-Inflation Phys. Lett. B 1999 458 209 218 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00603-6 · DOI · Paper page
  58. [61]Armendariz-Picon C Mukhanov VF Steinhardt PJ A dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late-time cosmic acceleration Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000 85 4438 4441 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4438 11082565 · DOI · Paper page
  59. [62]Armendariz-Picon C Mukhanov VF Steinhardt PJ Essentials of k-essence Phys. Rev. D 2001 63 103510 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.103510 · DOI
  60. [63]Arvanitaki A Dimopoulos S Dubovsky S Kaloper N March-Russell J String Axiverse Phys. Rev. D 2010 81 123530 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.123530 · DOI · Paper page
  61. [64]Arvanitaki A Dubovsky S Exploring the string axiverse with precision black hole physics Phys. Rev. D 2011 83 044026 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.044026 · DOI
  62. [65]Avgoustidis A Burrage C Redondo J Verde L Jimenez R Constraints on cosmic opacity and beyond the standard model physics from cosmological distance measurements J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010 2010 10 024 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/10/024 · DOI
  63. [66]Avgoustidis A Verde L Jimenez R Consistency among distance measurements: transparency, BAO scale and accelerated expansion J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2009 2009 06 012 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/06/012 · DOI
  64. [67]Avila-Reese V Colín P Valenzuela O D’Onghia E Firmani C Formation and Structure of Halos in a Warm Dark Matter Cosmology Astrophys. J. 2001 559 516 530 10.1086/322411 · DOI
  65. [68]Axelsson, M.J., Hansen, F.K., Koivisto, T. and Mota, D.F., “CMB Anomalies from Imperfect Dark Energy: Confrontation with the Data”, arXiv, e-print, (2011). [ADS], [arXiv:1109.2778 [astro-ph.CO]]. (Cited on page 25.) · arXiv
  66. [69]Ayaita, Y., Weber, M. and Wetterich, C., “Peculiar Velocity Anomaly from Forces Beyond Gravity?”, arXiv, e-print, (2009). [ADS], [arXiv:0908.2903 [astro-ph.CO]]. (Cited on page 150.) · arXiv
  67. [70]Babich D Creminelli P Zaldarriaga M The shape of non-Gaussianities J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2004 2004 08 009 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/08/009 · DOI
  68. [71]Babichev E Mukhanov VF Vikman A k-Essence, superluminal propagation, causality and emergent geometry J. High Energy Phys. 2008 2008 02 101 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/101 · DOI
  69. [72]Bacon DJ Taylor AN Mapping the 3D dark matter potential with weak shear Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2003 344 1307 1326 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06922.x · DOI
  70. [73]Baker T Ferreira PG Skordis C The parameterized post-Friedmann framework for theories of modified gravity: Concepts, formalism, and examples Phys. Rev. D 2013 87 024015 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024015 · DOI · Paper page
  71. [74]Balbi A Bruni M Quercellini C AαDM: Observational constraints on unified dark matter with constant speed ofsound Phys. Rev. D 2007 76 103519 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.103519 · DOI
  72. [75]Baldi M Clarifying the effects of interacting dark energy on linear and non-linear structure formation processes Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011 414 116 128 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18263.x · DOI
  73. [76]Baldi M Time-dependent couplings in the dark sector: from background evolution to non-linear structure formation Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011 411 1077 1103 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17758.x · DOI
  74. [77]Baldi M Pettorino V High-z massive clusters as a test for dynamical coupled dark energy Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011 412 L1 L5 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00975.x · DOI
  75. [78]Baldi M Pettorino V Amendola L Wetterich C Oscillating non-linear large-scale structures in growing neutrino quintessence Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011 418 214 229 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19477.x · DOI
  76. [79]Baldi M Pettorino V Robbers G Springel V Hydrodynamical N-body simulations of coupled dark energy cosmologies Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010 403 1684 1702 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15987.x · DOI
  77. [80]Baldi M Viel M The impact of coupled dark energy cosmologies on the high-redshift intergalactic medium Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010 409 L89 L93 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00954.x · DOI
  78. [81]Ballinger WE Peacock JA Heavens AF Measuring the cosmological constant with redshift surveys Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1996 282 877 888 10.1093/mnras/282.3.877 · DOI
  79. [82]Baltz EA Murayama H Gravitino warm dark matter with entropy production J. High Energy Phys. 2003 2003 05 067 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/067 · DOI
  80. [83]Bañados M Ferreira PG Skordis C Eddington-Born-Infeld gravity and the large scale structure of the Universe Phys. Rev. D 2009 79 063511 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.063511 · DOI · Paper page
  81. [84]Banks T Dine M The Cosmology of String Theoretic Axions Nucl. Phys. B 1997 505 445 460 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00413-6 · DOI
  82. [85]Bardeen JM Bond JR Kaiser N Szalay AS The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields Astrophys. J. 1986 304 15 61 10.1086/164143 · DOI · Paper page
  83. [86]Bardeen JM Steinhardt PJ Turner MS Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe Phys. Rev. D 1983 28 679 693 10.1103/PhysRevD.28.679 · DOI · Paper page
  84. [87]Barkana R Haiman Z Ostriker JP Constraints on Warm Dark Matter from Cosmological Reioniza-tion Astrophys. J. 2001 558 482 496 10.1086/322393 · DOI
  85. [88]Barnaby N Cline JM Non-Gaussian and nonscale-invariant perturbations from tachyonic preheating in hybrid inflation Phys. Rev. D 2006 73 106012 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.106012 · DOI
  86. [89]Barrow JD Juszkiewicz R Sonoda DH Universal rotation: how large can it be? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1985 213 917 943 10.1093/mnras/213.4.917 · DOI
  87. [90]Bartelmann M Narayan R Seitz S Schneider P Maximum Likelihood Cluster Reconstruction Astrophys. J. Lett. 1996 464 L115 10.1086/310114 · DOI
  88. [91]Bartolo N Dimastrogiovanni E Matarrese S Riotto A Anisotropic Bispectrum of Curvature Perturbations from Primordial Non-Abelian Vector Fields J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2009 2009 10 015 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/015 · DOI
  89. [92]Bartolo N Dimastrogiovanni E Matarrese S Riotto A Anisotropic trispectrum of curvature perturbations induced by primordial non-Abelian vector fields J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2009 2009 11 028 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/11/028 · DOI
  90. [93]Bartolo N Komatsu E Matarrese S Riotto A Non-Gaussianity from inflation: theory and observations Phys. Rep. 2004 402 103 266 10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.022 · DOI
  91. [94]Bartolo N Matarrese S Riotto A Signatures of primordial non-Gaussianity in the large-scale structure of the universe J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2005 2005 10 010 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/10/010 · DOI
  92. [95]Basse T Bjælde OE Wong YYY Spherical collapse of dark energy with an arbitrary sound speed J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011 2011 10 038 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/10/038 · DOI
  93. [96]Bassett BA Optimising cosmological surveys in a crowded market Phys. Rev. D 2005 71 083517 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.083517 · DOI
  94. [97]Bassett BA Corasaniti PS Kunz M The essence of quintessence and the cost of compression Astrophys. J. 2004 617 L1 L4 10.1086/427023 · DOI
  95. [98]Bassett, B.A., Fantaye, Y., Hlozek, R. and Kotze, J., “Fisher4Cast Users’ Manual”, arXiv, e-print, (2009). [arXiv:0906.0974 [astro-ph.IM]]. (Cited on page 212.) · arXiv
  96. [99]Bassett BA Fantaye Y Hlozek R Kotze J Fisher Matrix Preloaded — Fisher4Cast Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2011 20 2559 2598 10.1142/S0218271811020548 · DOI
  97. [100]Bassett BA Kunz M Cosmic Acceleration versus Axion-Photon Mixing Astrophys. J. 2004 607 661 664 10.1086/383520 · DOI
  98. [101]Bassett BA Kunz M Cosmic distance-duality as a probe of exotic physics and acceleration Phys. Rev. D 2004 69 101305 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.101305 · DOI
  99. [102]Bassett BA Kunz M Silk J Ungarelli C A late-time transition in the cosmic dark energy? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2002 336 1217 1222 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05887.x · DOI
  100. [103]Bassett BA Parkinson D Nichol RC Designer Cosmology Astrophys. J. 2005 626 L1 L4 10.1086/431650 · DOI
  101. [104]Bassett BA Tsujikawa S Wands D Inflation dynamics and reheating Rev. Mod. Phys. 2006 78 537 589 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.537 · DOI
  102. [105]Batell B Gherghetta T Localized U(1) gauge fields, millicharged particles, and holography Phys. Rev. D 2006 73 045016 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.045016 · DOI
  103. [106]Battye RA Moss A Anisotropic perturbations due to dark energy Phys. Rev. D 2006 74 041301 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.041301 · DOI
  104. [107]Battye RA Pearson JA Effective action approach to cosmological perturbations in dark energy and modified gravity J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012 2012 07 019 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/07/019 · DOI
  105. [108]Baugh CM Lacey CG Frenk CS Granato GL Silva L Bressan A Benson AJ Cole S Can the faint submillimetre galaxies be explained in the Λ cold dark matter model? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2005 356 1191 1200 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08553.x · DOI
  106. [109]Baumann D Inflation Working Group Dodelson S Probing Inflation with CMB Polarization CMB Polarization Workshop: Theory and Foregrounds: CMBPol Mission Concept Study 2009 Melville, NY American Institute of Physics 10 120
  107. [110]Bean R Bernat D Pogosian L Silvestri A Trodden M Dynamics of linear perturbations in f(R) gravity Phys. Rev. D 2007 75 064020 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.064020 · DOI
  108. [111]Bean R Chen X Peiris H Xu J Comparing Infrared Dirac-Born-Infeld Brane Inflation to Observations Phys. Rev. D 2008 77 023527 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.023527 · DOI
  109. [112]Bean R Dore O Probing dark energy perturbations: The Dark energy equation of state and speed of sound as measured by WMAP Phys. Rev. D 2004 69 083503 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.083503 · DOI
  110. [113]Bean R Dunkley J Pierpaoli E Constraining isocurvature initial conditions with WMAP 3-year data Phys. Rev. D 2006 74 063503 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.063503 · DOI
  111. [114]Bean R Flanagan ÉÉ Laszlo I Trodden M Constraining Interactions in Cosmology’s Dark Sector Phys. Rev. D 2008 78 123514 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.123514 · DOI
  112. [115]Bean R Tangmatitham M Current constraints on the cosmic growth history Phys. Rev. D 2010 81 083534 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.083534 · DOI · Paper page
  113. [116]Bekenstein JD The relation between physical and gravitational geometry Phys. Rev. D 1993 48 3641 3647 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3641 10016638 · DOI
  114. [117]Bekenstein JD Relativistic gravitation theory for the MOND paradigm Phys. Rev. D 2004 70 083509 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083509 · DOI · Paper page
  115. [118]Beltrán M García-Bellido J Lesgourgues J Isocurvature bounds on axions revisited Phys. Rev. D 2007 75 103507 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.103507 · DOI
  116. [119]Beltrán M García-Bellido J Lesgourgues J Liddle AR Slosar A Bayesian model selection and isocurvature perturbations Phys. Rev. D 2005 71 063532 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063532 · DOI
  117. [120]Beltrán M García-Bellido J Lesgourgues J Riazuelo A Bounds on cold dark matter and neutrino isocurvature perturbations from CMB and LSS data Phys. Rev. D 2004 70 103530 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.103530 · DOI
  118. [122]Bennett CL Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Are There Cosmic Microwave Background Anomalies? Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2011 192 17 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/17 · DOI
  119. [123]Bento MC Bertolami O Sen AA Generalized Chaplygin gas, accelerated expansion, and dark-energy-matter unification Phys. Rev. D 2002 66 043507 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.043507 · DOI
  120. [124]Bento MC Bertolami O Sen AA Letter: Generalized Chaplygin Gas Model: Dark Energy-Dark Matter Unification and CMBR Constraints Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2003 35 2063 2069 10.1023/A:1026207312105 · DOI
  121. [125]Bernardeau F Bonvin C Vernizzi F Full-sky lensing shear at second order Phys. Rev. D 2010 81 083002 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.083002 · DOI
  122. [126]Bernardeau F Uzan J-P Non-Gaussianity in multifield inflation Phys. Rev. D 2002 66 103506 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.103506 · DOI · Paper page
  123. [127]Bertacca D Bartolo N Diaferio A Matarrese S How the scalar field of unified dark matter models can cluster J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2008 2008 10 023 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/023 · DOI
  124. [128]Bertacca D Bartolo N Matarrese S Unified Dark Matter Scalar Field Models Adv. Astron. 2010 2010 904379 10.1155/2010/904379 · DOI
  125. [129]Bertolami O Pedro FG Le Delliou M The Abell Cluster A586 and the Equivalence Principle Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2009 41 2839 2846 10.1007/s10714-009-0810-1 · DOI
  126. [130]Bertotti B Iess L Tortora P A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft Nature 2003 425 374 376 10.1038/nature01997 14508481 · DOI · Paper page
  127. [131]Bertschinger E Zukin P Distinguishing modified gravity from dark energy Phys. Rev. D 2008 78 024015 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.024015 · DOI
  128. [132]Beynon E Bacon DJ Koyama K Weak lensing predictions for modified gravities at non-linear scales Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010 403 353 362 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16117.x · DOI
  129. [133]Bezrukov F Shaposhnikov M The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton Phys. Lett. B 2008 659 703 706 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.072 · DOI
  130. [134]Bi H Davidsen AF Evolution of Structure in the Intergalactic Medium and the Nature of the Lyα Forest Astrophys. J. 1997 479 523 10.1086/303908 · DOI
  131. [135]Bi X-J Feng B Li H Zhang X Cosmological evolution of interacting dark energy models with mass varying neutrinos Phys. Rev. D 2005 72 123523 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.123523 · DOI
  132. [136]Biermann PL Munyaneza F Kleinert H Jantzen RT Ruffini R Dark matter and sterile neutrinos The Eleventh Marcel Grossmann Meeting: On recent developments in theoretical and experimental general relativity, gravitation, and relativistic field theories 2008 Singapore; River Edge World Scientific 291 308
  133. [137]Bilić N Tupper GB Viollier RD Unification of dark matter and dark energy: the inhomogeneous Chaplygin gas Phys. Lett. B 2002 535 17 21 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)01716-1 · DOI
  134. [138]Binétruy P Models of dynamical supersymmetry breaking and quintessence Phys. Rev. D 1999 60 063502 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.063502 · DOI
  135. [139]Bjælde OE Brookfield AW van de Bruck C Hannestad S Mota DF Schrempp L Tocchini-Valentini D Neutrino Dark Energy — Revisiting the Stability Issue J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2008 2008 01 026 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/01/026 · DOI
  136. [140]Blake CA Abdalla FB Bridle SL Rawlings S Cosmology with the Square Kilometre Array New Astron. Rev. 2004 48 1063 1077 10.1016/j.newar.2004.09.045 · DOI
  137. [141]Blomqvist M Mörtsell E Supernovae as seen by off-center observers in a local void J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010 2010 05 006 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/05/006 · DOI
  138. [142]Bloomfield JK Flanagan ÉÉ Park M Watson S Dark energy or modified gravity? An effective field theory approach J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013 2013 08 010 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/08/010 · DOI · Paper page
  139. [143]Bode P Ostriker JP Turok N Halo Formation in Warm Dark Matter Models Astrophys. J. 2001 556 93 107 10.1086/321541 · DOI
  140. [144]Boehmer CG Caldera-Cabral G Chan N Lazkoz R Maartens R Quintessence with quadratic coupling to dark matter Phys. Rev. D 2010 81 083003 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.083003 · DOI
  141. [145]Boehmer CG Caldera-Cabral G Lazkoz R Maartens R Dynamics ofdark energy with a coupling to dark matter Phys. Rev. D 2008 78 023505 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.023505 · DOI
  142. [146]Boisseau B Esposito-Farèse G Polarski D Starobinsky AA Reconstruction of a scalar-tensor theory of gravity in an accelerating universe Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000 85 2236 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2236 10977980 · DOI
  143. [147]Bond JR Cole S Efstathiou G Kaiser N Excursion set mass functions for hierarchical Gaussian fluctuations Astrophys. J. 1991 379 440 460 10.1086/170520 · DOI
  144. [148]Bond JR Frolov AV Huang Z Kofman L Non-Gaussian Curvature Spikes from Chaotic Billiards in Inflation Preheating Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009 103 071301 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.071301 19792629 · DOI
  145. [149]Bonometto SA Casarini L Macciò AV Stinson G High precision spectra at large redshift for dynamical DE cosmologies J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2010 259 012025
  146. [150]Bonvin C Effect of Peculiar Motion in Weak Lensing Phys. Rev. D 2008 78 123530 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.123530 · DOI
  147. [151]Borgani, S. and Masiero, A., “Dark Matter and the Scale of SUSY Breaking”, arXiv, e-print, (1997). [ADS], [arXiv:hep-ph/9701417]. (Cited on page 135.) · arXiv
  148. [153]Borriello A Salucci P The dark matter distribution in disc galaxies Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2001 323 285 292 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04077.x · DOI
  149. [154]Bose N Majumdar AS Unified model of k-inflation, dark matter, and dark energy Phys. Rev. D 2009 80 103508 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.103508 · DOI
  150. [155]Boubekeur L Lyth DH Detecting a small perturbation through its non-Gaussianity Phys. Rev. D 2006 73 021301 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.021301 · DOI
  151. [156]Bourassa RR Kantowski R The theory of transparent gravitational lenses Astrophys. J. 1975 195 13 21 10.1086/153300 · DOI
  152. [157]Bourliot F Ferreira PG Mota DF Skordis C Cosmological behavior of Bekenstein’s modified theory of gravity Phys. Rev. D 2007 75 063508 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.063508 · DOI
  153. [158]Bowen R Hansen SH Melchiorri A Silk J Trotta R The Impact of an Extra Background of Relativistic Particles on the Cosmological Parameters derived from Microwave Background Anisotropies Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2002 334 760 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05570.x · DOI
  154. [159]Boyanovsky D de Vega HJ Sanchez N Constraints on dark matter particles from theory, galaxy observations and N-body simulations Phys. Rev. D 2008 77 043518 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043518 · DOI
  155. [160]Boyarsky A Lesgourgues J Ruchayskiy O Viel M Realistic sterile neutrino dark matter with keV mass does not contradict cosmological bounds Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009 102 201304 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.201304 19519017 · DOI
  156. [161]Boyarsky A Neronov A Ruchayskiy O Shaposhnikov M The masses of active neutrinos in the νMSM from X-ray astronomy JETP Lett. 2006 83 133 135 10.1134/S0021364006040011 · DOI
  157. [162]Bradač M Allen SW Treu T Ebeling H Massey R Morris RG von der Linden A Applegate D Revealing the Properties of Dark Matter in the Merging Cluster MACS J0025.4-1222 Astrophys. J. 2008 687 959 967 10.1086/591246 · DOI · Paper page
  158. [163]Bradač M Schneider P Lombardi M Erben T Strong and weak lensing united Astron. Astrophys. 2005 437 39 48 10.1051/0004-6361:20042233 · DOI
  159. [164]Bradač M Strong and Weak Lensing United. III. Measuring the Mass Distribution of the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1ES 0657-558 Astrophys. J. 2006 652 937 947 10.1086/508601 · DOI
  160. [165]Branchini E Plionis M Sciama DW Reconstructing Positions and Peculiar Velocities of Galaxy Clusters within 25,000 Kilometers per Second: The Bulk Velocity Astrophys. J. Lett. 1996 461 L17 10.1086/309993 · DOI
  161. [166]Brandbyge J Hannestad S Grid based linear neutrino perturbations in cosmological N-body simulations J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2009 2009 05 002 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/002 · DOI
  162. [167]Brandbyge J Hannestad S Haugbølle T Thomsen B The effect of thermal neutrino motion on the non-linear cosmological matter power spectrum J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2008 2008 08 020 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/020 · DOI
  163. [168]Brandbyge J Hannestad S Haugbølle T Wong YYY Neutrinos in non-linear structure formation — the effect on halo properties J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010 2010 09 014 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/09/014 · DOI
  164. [169]Brax P Burrage C Davis A-C Seery D Weltman A Higgs production as a probe of chameleon dark energy Phys. Rev. D 2010 81 103524 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.103524 · DOI
  165. [170]Brax PH Martin J Quintessence and supergravity Phys. Lett. B 1999 468 40 45 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01209-5 · DOI
  166. [171]Brax P van de Bruck C Davis A-C Khoury J Weltman A Detecting dark energy in orbit: The cosmological chameleon Phys. Rev. D 2004 70 123518 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123518 · DOI
  167. [172]Brax P van de Bruck C Davis A-C Shaw DJ f(R) gravity and chameleon theories Phys. Rev. D 2008 78 104021 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.104021 · DOI
  168. [173]Brax P van de Bruck C Mota DF Nunes NJ Winther HA Chameleons with field-dependent couplings Phys. Rev. D 2010 82 083503 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.083503 · DOI
  169. [174]Bridges M Cranmer K Feroz F Hobson M Ruiz de Austri R Trotta R A coverage study of the CMSSM based on ATLAS sensitivity using fast neural networks techniques J. High Energy Phys. 2011 2011 03 012 10.1007/JHEP03(2011)012 · DOI
  170. [175]Broadhurst TJ Taylor AN Peacock JA Mapping cluster mass distributions via gravitational lensing of background galaxies Astrophys. J. 1995 438 49 61 10.1086/175053 · DOI
  171. [176]Brookfield AW van de Bruck C Hall LMH New interactions in the dark sector mediated by dark energy Phys. Rev. D 2008 77 043006 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043006 · DOI
  172. [177]Brookfield AW van de Bruck C Mota DF Tocchini-Valentini D Cosmology of mass-varying neutrinos driven by quintessence: Theory and observations Phys. Rev. D 2006 73 083515 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.083515 16605979 · DOI
  173. [178]Brookfield AW van de Bruck C Mota DF Tocchini-Valentini D Cosmology with massive neutrinos coupled to dark energy Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006 96 061301 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.061301 16605979 · DOI
  174. [179]Brouzakis N Pettorino V Tetradis N Wetterich C Nonlinear matter spectra in growing neutrino quintessence J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011 2011 03 049 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/049 · DOI
  175. [180]Brouzakis N Tetradis N Wetterich C Neutrino Lumps in Quintessence Cosmology Phys. Lett. B 2008 665 131 134 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.05.068 · DOI
  176. [181]Brümmer F Jaeckel J Khoze VV Magnetic mixing — electric minicharges from magnetic monopoles J. High Energy Phys. 2009 2009 06 037 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/06/037 · DOI
  177. [182]Buchbinder EI Khoury J Ovrut BA New ekpyrotic cosmology Phys. Rev. D 2007 76 123503 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.123503 18518270 · DOI
  178. [183]Buchbinder EI Khoury J Ovrut BA Non-Gaussianities in New Ekpyrotic Cosmology Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008 100 171302 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.171302 18518270 · DOI
  179. [184]Bucher M Moodley K Turok N Constraining Isocurvature Perturbations with Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001 87 191301 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.191301 11690402 · DOI
  180. [185]Buchert T On Average Properties of Inhomogeneous Fluids in General Relativity: Dust Cosmologies Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2000 32 105 125 10.1023/A:1001800617177 · DOI
  181. [186]Buchert T Dark energy from structure: a status report Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2008 40 467 527 10.1007/s10714-007-0554-8 · DOI
  182. [187]Bull P Clifton T Ferreira PG Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect as a test of general radial inhomogeneity in Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi cosmology Phys. Rev. D 2012 85 024002 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024002 · DOI
  183. [188]Bullock, J.S., “Notes on the Missing Satellites Problem”, arXiv, e-print, (2010). [ADS], [arXiv:1009.4505[astro-ph.CO]]. (Cited on page 133.) · arXiv
  184. [189]Bunn EF Ferreira PG Silk J How Anisotropic is Our Universe? Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996 77 2883 2886 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2883 10062076 · DOI
  185. [190]Burrage C Supernova brightening from chameleon-photon mixing Phys. Rev. D 2008 77 043009 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043009 · DOI
  186. [192]Caldera-Cabral G Maartens R Schaefer BM The Growth of Structure in Interacting Dark Energy Models J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2009 2009 07 027 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/07/027 · DOI
  187. [193]Caldera-Cabral G Maartens R Ureña-López LA Dynamics of interacting dark energy Phys. Rev. D 2009 79 063518 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.063518 · DOI
  188. [194]Caldwell R Cooray A Melchiorri A Constraints on a new post-general relativity cosmological parameter Phys. Rev. D 2007 76 023507 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.023507 · DOI · Paper page
  189. [195]Caldwell RR Dave R Steinhardt PJ Cosmological Imprint of an Energy Component with General Equation of State Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998 80 1582 1585 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1582 · DOI
  190. [196]Caldwell RR Linder EV Limits of Quintessence Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005 95 141301 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.141301 16241640 · DOI
  191. [197]Caldwell RR Stebbins A A Test of the Copernican Principle Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008 100 191302 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.191302 18518434 · DOI
  192. [198]Camera S Bertacca D Diaferio A Bartolo N Matarrese S Weak lensing signal in Unified Dark Matter models Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009 399 1995 2003 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15326.x · DOI
  193. [199]Camera S Diaferio A Cardone VF Testing a Phenomenologically Extended DGP Model with Upcoming Weak Lensing Surveys J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011 2011 01 029 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/01/029 · DOI
  194. [200]Camera S Diaferio A Cardone VF Tomography from the Next Generation of Cosmic Shear Experiments for Viable f(R) Models J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011 2011 07 016 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/016 · DOI
  195. [201]Camera S Kitching TD Heavens AF Bertacca D Diaferio A Measuring unified dark matter with 3D cosmic shear Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010 415 399 409 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18712.x · DOI
  196. [202]Camera S Kitching TD Heavens AF Bertacca D Diaferio A Measuring unified uark matter with 3D cosmic shear Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011 415 399 409 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18712.x · DOI
  197. [203]Campanelli L Cea P Tedesco L Cosmic microwave background quadrupole and ellipsoidal universe Phys. Rev. D 2007 76 063007 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.063007 17026023 · DOI
  198. [204]Capozziello S Curvature Quintessence Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2002 11 483 491 10.1142/S0218271802002025 · DOI
  199. [205]Capozziello S Nesseris S Perivolaropoulos L Reconstruction of the scalar-tensor Lagrangian from a ΛCDM background and Noether symmetry J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2007 2007 12 009 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/12/009 · DOI
  200. [206]Capozziello S Nojiri S Odintsov SD Unified phantom cosmology: Inflation, dark energy and dark matter under the same standard Phys. Lett. B 2006 632 597 604 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.012 · DOI

200 of 935 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., Branchini, E., Burrage, C., Camera, S., Carbone, C., Casarini, L., Cropper, M., de Rham, C., Di Porto, C., Ealet, A., Ferreira, P. G., Finelli, F., García-Bellido, J., Giannantonio, T., Guzzo, L., Heavens, A., Heisenberg, L., Heymans, C., Hoekstra, H., Hollenstein, L., Holmes, R., Horst, O., Jahnke, K., Kitching, T. D., Koivisto, T., Kunz, M., La Vacca, G., March, M., Majerotto, E., Markovic, K., Marsh, D., Marulli, F., Massey, R., Mellier, Y., Mota, D. F., Nunes, N. J., Percival, W., Pettorino, V., Porciani, C., Quercellini, C., Read, J., Rinaldi, M., Sapone, D., Scaramella, R., Skordis, C., Simpson, F., Taylor, A., Thomas, S., Trotta, R., Verde, L., Vernizzi, F., Vollmer, A., Wang, Y., Weller, J., & Zlosnik, T.
ORCID
Venue
Living Reviews in Relativity
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-09-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1433-8351 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-3613
DOI
10.12942/lrr-2013-6
PMC
PMC5660884
OpenAlex
W3100430560
Cited by
899
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 138 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 122 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
new_version (2018-04-12)
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Living Reviews in Relativity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • SDL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/I00162X/1, ST/K001051/1, ST/J001422/1, ST/J000388/1, ST/I00193X/1, ST/I001166/1, ST/H00260X/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
Euclid satellite, dark energy, modified gravity, dark matter, initial conditions, cosmic expansion history, galaxy evolution, galaxy clusters, fundamental physics, cosmological data analysis, beyond the Standard Model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review