A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
L2 writers use reference materials as language repositories, noting potentially useful phrases and words for later use.
“Past research shows L2 writers using reference materials as language repositories [52], where they may note down potentially useful phrases and words from the text for later use [32]”
From Interacting with Next-Phrase Suggestions: How Suggestion Systems Aid and Influence the Cognitive Processes of Writing (2023) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 196
- Authors
- Plakans, L., & Gebril, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- American University in Cairo (EG)
- Corresponding author
- Plakans, Lia
- Venue
- Assessing Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-34
- ISSN
- 1075-2935 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069916046
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 55.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessing Writing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Michigan
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- source use, writing from sources, integrated reading and writing, discourse synthesis, text comprehension, writing skills, think-aloud, second language writing, writing instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
